Abstract:

The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. By using primary and secondary legal materials, along with tertiary legal materials as supporting materials. This is by looking at the strength and position of the Visum Et Repertum evidence in a criminal act. Visum et Repertum has a fairly strong evidentiary power, because Visum et Repertum is one of the documents of evidence as regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c Jo. Article 187 letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Public Prosecutor's indictment was made with great attention to the evidence for the role of Visum et Repertum. The consequence that arises if the Visum et Repertum given by the Defendant is a different statement is that the statement can be revoked if the Defendant is given a false confession that is indeed proven. Regarding the Visum et Repertum itself, it can be re-examined from a legal advisor or a statement of objection raised clearly given by the defendant can be proven, this is regulated in Article 180 paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code.  Based on the experience, it was carried out and from the Judge himself it was known.

Keywords: