User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 16
 Views 313
 Downloands 98
İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Sınav Soruları ile Teog Matematik Sorularının Yenilenmiş Bloom Taksonomisine Göre Analizi
2017
Journal:  
Current Research in Education
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of this study is the comparative analysis of the TEOG math questions and elementary mathematics teachers’ written exam questions according to Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Under the research, 40 TEOG questions applied in fall term in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 academic years and 240 teachers’ written math exam questions that measure the same learning outcomes were examined. As a result, there was no question which measures the factual and metacognitive knowledge in the knowledge dimension of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The rate of questions that measures conceptual knowledge is higher in teachers’ written exam questions. However, the questions which measure procedural knowledge is higher in TEOG. While there were 9 questions to measure the remembering step in teachers’ written exams, there was no question that measures this step in TEOG questions. Moreover, according to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy dimensions, the distributions of teachers’ written exam questions and TEOG questions were compared according to the source of questions and school achievement level independent variables. The Chi-Square of independence test revealed a statistically significant relationship between the cognitive process dimension distributions.

Keywords:

Primary Mathematics Teachers' Exam Questions and Teog Mathematics Questions Analysis According To The Updated Bloom Taksonomy
2017
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of this study is the comparative analysis of the TEOG math questions and elementary math teachers' written exam questions according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Under the research, 40 TEOG questions applied in fall term in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 academic years and 240 teachers' written math exam questions that measure the same learning outcomes were examined. As a result, there was no question that measures the factual and metacognitive knowledge in the knowledge dimension of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The rate of questions that measures conceptual knowledge is higher in teachers' written exam questions. However, the questions that measure procedural knowledge is higher in TEOG. While there were 9 questions to measure the remembering step in teachers' written exams, there was no question that measures this step in TEOG questions. Moreover, according to the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy dimensions, the distribution of teachers' written exam questions and TEOG questions were compared according to the source of questions and school achievement level independent variables. The Chi-Square of Independence test revealed a statistically significant relationship between the cognitive process dimension distribution.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Current Research in Education

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 56
Cite : 254
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index