User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 6
 Views 106
 Downloands 38
EFL STUDENTS’ REFLECTIONS ON EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
2017
Journal:  
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

Written corrective feedback given by the teacher on students’ essays plays a significant role in the development of language and writing skills of second language (L2) learners. Whether explicit (direct) feedback or implicit (indirect) feedback should be given to students’ errors in essays, and which of these is more beneficial to learners has been a concern of L2 writing researchers for some time. However, the issue of learners’ preferences on the types of written corrective feedback has been overlooked. This paper aims to investigate Turkish speaking English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ ideas about explicit and implicit written corrective feedback. The authors attempt to answer the following questions:   1-       What are Turkish secondary school students’ attitudes towards writing in English as a foreign language? 2-       What are their preferences in relation to two different types of written corrective feedback (explicit and implicit)?   In order to shed light on the students’ opinions and preferences in terms of written corrective feedback, a study was conducted at a Turkish state secondary school in Istanbul. Seventy (70) seventh-grade female students, whose ages were around 12, participated in this study.  Half of the students received explicit feedback on their essays, while the other half received implicit feedback. Students’ opinions were collected via a questionnaire comprised of nine Likert-type items and one open-ended question during the fall semester of 2016-2017 academic year. The closed items were analyzed by conducting descriptive statistics, while qualitative data analysis was used for the answers to the open-ended item. Results reveal that students in both groups preferred one type of written corrective feedback more than the other type. Various factors that might play a role in this result as well as suggestions for EFL teachers will be discussed.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 276
Cite : 2.569
2023 Impact : 0.333
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences