User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 37
 Downloands 19
Acentenin Denkleştirme İstemine ve Rekabet Yasağı Anlaşmasına İlişkin Hükümlerin 6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 103(1). Maddesinde Sayılanlar Hakkında Uygulanırlığı
2012
Journal:  
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Referring to Article 122 of Turkish Commercial Code (hereinafter referred as TCC) which is going to go in effect on July 01, 2012, the request for adjustment and the agreement for the prohibition of competition in Article 122 of TCC was resolved. Thus, the relationship between Article 122 of TCC for the adjustments to be made and Article 123 concerning the agreement of prohibition of competition included in Section 7 of Volume 1 TCC is first discussed. This study reviews whether the persons, although not agencies, but subject to the terms of agencies are to benefit from requests for adjustments and prohibition from competition. Our study will analyze in depth the contents of the Article 103(1) of TCC, Article 122 arranging the claims for adjustments for cases listed in Article 103(1) and Article 123 for the agreement to be concluded for prohibition from competition

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 335
Cite : 1.452
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi