İslâm aile hukukuna dair hükümler modern anlamda ve kapsamlı bir şekilde 1917 tarihinde yürürlüğe giren Hukūk-ı Âile Kararnâmesi ile kanunlaştırılmıştır. Ancak Kararnâme birçok açıdan hem Müslüman ilim ve fikir adamları hem de gayr-i müslimler tarafından eleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada gerek Osmanlı gerekse Cumhuriyet döneminde Müslüman ilim ve fikir adamlarının Kararname’ye yönelttikleri eleştiriler incelenmiştir. Gayr-i müslimlerin ise sadece Kararnâme’nin geneline ilişkin eleştirilerine yer verilmiş, kendilerine özel hükümlere yönelik eleştirileri ele alınmamıştır. Yapılan eleştiriler ilk elden kaynaklara ulaşılarak tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu eleştiriler Kararnâme’nin hazırlanma ve kanunlaştırma sürecine, şerʻ-i şerîfe aykırılığına, halkın maslahatının gözetilmeden hazırlandığına, mahkemelere verdiği yetkilere ve içeriğindeki eksikliklere yönelik eleştiriler ana başlıkları altında incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Eleştiri konusu olan meselelerin birçoğunun bugün de tartışılmaya devam eden meseleler olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.
The Islamic rules relating to the family were legislated as modern laws for the first time in Islamic history by issuing the Ottoman Family Law Decree in 1917. However, the decree was criticized in many ways by both Muslim scholars and intellectuals and non-Muslims. This study examines the criticisms directed by the Muslim scholars and intellectuals in the late Ottoman era and afterwards. It also includes the criticisms directed by the non-Muslims in general, but not inparticular. The criticisms were classified into the following sub-headings: criticisms against the preparation and issuing process, its violation of the Shari'a, its preparation without considering the interests of the community, giving inappropriate powers to the courts, and the shortcomings of the rules and their contents. It is possible to say that many issues subject to criticism are still disputed today.
The Islamic rules relating to the family were legislated as modern laws for the first time in Islamic history by issuing The Ottoman Family Law Decree in 1917. However, the decree was criticized in many ways by both Muslim scholars and intellectuals and non-Muslims. This study examines the criticisms directed by the Muslim scholars and intellectuals in the late Ottoman era and afterwards. It also includes the criticisms directed by the non-Muslims in general, but not inparticular. The criticisms were classified into the following sub-headings: criticisms against the preparation and issuing process, its violation of the Shariʻa, its preparation without considering the interests of the community, giving inappropriate powers to the courts, and the shortcomings of the rules and their contents. It is possible to say that many issues subjected to criticism are still disputed today.
Relevant Articles | Author | # |
---|
Article | Author | # |
---|