User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 28
 Downloands 9
A Comparative Study Of Trademarks Under German and Turkish Law
2002
Journal:  
Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

With Decision 1/95 of the EC Turkey Association Council, Turkey and the EC established a Customs Union. ln implementing that decision Turkey also undertook the obligation to ensure effective protection and enforcement of  intellectual property rights. Annex Vlll of thr same decision provides specific measures in the field of lntellectual property rights that Turkey should bring into effect. According to a new Decree-Law No. 556 Pertaining to the Protection of Trademarks was adopted in Turkey and entered into force on June 27, 1995, to harmonize the Turkish trademark system with European standards, especially with the TRIPS Agreement and the EC Council Directive EEC 89/104. The legal basis for the protection of trademarks in Turkey before was Law No: 551 of March 3, 1965. As with the Turkish law the German law also had to be amended according to the EC Council Directive in 1994 and came into force on January 1, 1995. The new German Trademark Law replaced the former "Warenzeichengesetz" trademark law, which dated back to 1874. Considering the latest amendments to the German and Turkish Trademark Laws similarities in both laws show that Turkey has adapted great parts of its trademark laws to the European standard. 

Keywords:

0
2002
Author:  
Abstract:

With Decision 1/95 of the EC·Turkey .4.ssociation CoU11cil, T:,;rkey ami the EC established a Customs Union. ln implementing that decision Turkey also underrook the obligation to ensure effective protection and enforcement cif intellectual property rights. 1 Annex Vlll of thr same decision provides specific measures in the field of lrttellectual property rights that Turkey should bring inro effect. A.ccording~v a new Decree-Law No. 556 Pertainingto the Protection of Trademarks was adopted in Turkey and entered inM force on .lune 27, /995, to harmonize the Turkish trademark system 'trith European standards, especially with the TRIPS Agreement and the EC Council Directive EEC 891104.2 The legal basis for 1he prot~:ction of trademarks in Turkey before was Law No.' 551 of March 3, 1965. As with the Turkish law the German law also luui to be amended according to the EC Council Directive in 1994 and came into force on Jantlilry I, 1995. 5 The new Gennan Trademark Law replaced the former "Warenzeichengesetz" trademark law, which dated back to 1874. Considering the latest amendments to the German and Turkish Trademark Laws similarities in both laws show that Turkey has adapted great parts of its trademark laws to the European st(lJI.dard. 

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles




Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 441
Cite : 554
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index