User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 66
 Downloands 23
Kamu Hukuku Acisindan Otokratik Yonetim - Gayrisahsi Devlet İktidari İliskisi ve ‘staatsgewalt’ Kavrami
2020
Journal:  
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

One of the current debates on public law is the discussion on the personalization of political governments, which has been evaluated in connection with authoritarianism and exceptionalization. It is observed that the constitutional architectures of authoritarian regimes have changed in recent years. The most significant point here is the personalization of political authority, whereas the fundamental feature of the modern state is impersonality and publicity of the state power. In this respect, this article aims to evaluate the case of personalization of political governing in relation to the concept of state power [Staatsgewalt]. To this end, the article firstly focuses on the main difference between normal and exceptional governments in terms of classical constitutional doctrine. Then, it examines ‘authoritarian state’- ‘autocratic authority/rule’ nexus. Finally, the article discusses theoretical meaning of personalization of political authority in relation to the concept of impersonal state power.

Keywords:

Autocratic Governance In Public Law - The Relationship Of State Power and The Concept Of 'staatsgewalt'
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

One of the current debates on public law is the discussion on the personalization of political governments, which has been evaluated in connection with authoritarianism and exceptionalization. It is observed that the constitutional architectures of authoritarian regimes have changed in recent years. The most significant point here is the personalization of political authority, whereas the fundamental feature of the modern state is impersonality and publicity of the state power. In this regard, this article aims to evaluate the case of personalization of political governance in relation to the concept of state power [Staatsgewalt]. To this end, the article firstly focuses on the main difference between normal and exceptional governments in terms of classical constitutional doctrine. Then, it examines 'authoritarian state'- 'autocratic authority/rule' nexus. Finally, the article discusses the theoretical meaning of personalization of political authority in relation to the concept of impersonal state power.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 726
Cite : 2.732
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index