User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 17
 Views 204
 Downloands 87
Bulanık Ahp ve Bulanık Topsıs ile Bütünleşik Karar Destek Modeli Önerisi: Özel Okullarda Öğretmen Seçimi
2019
Journal:  
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Çok sayıda alternatif ve kriterin bulunduğu karar problemlerinin çözümü için geliştirilen yöntemler, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Birbirleriyle çelişen çok sayıda kriter ve alternatifin bulunduğu karar problemlerinde bulanıklık ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi (AHP) ve Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemleri ile bütünleşik bir karar destek modeli önerilmiştir. Çalışmada; karar vermede etkili olan kriterlerin önem ağırlıkları Bulanık AHP ile belirlenmiş, alternatiflerin sıralama ve seçimi ise Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Uygulama kısmında özel okullarda öğretmen seçimi, önerilen karar destek yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Önerilen yöntemin karar destek modeli olarak başarılı bir şekilde kullanılabileceği görülmüştür.

Keywords:

Bulanik Ahp ve Bulanik Topsis Ile Butunlesik Karar Destek Modeli Onerisi: Ozel Okullarda Ogretmen Secimi
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The methods developed to solve decision-making problems with numerous alternatives and criteria are defined as multi-criteria decision-making methods. There are many criteria and alternatives that are contradictory to each other. This study proposed an integrated decision support model with the Bully Analytical Hierarchy (AHP) and the Bully TOPSIS methods. In the study; the importance of criteria that are effective in decision-making is determined by the Bully AHP, and the ranking and selection of alternatives is made by the Bully TOPSIS method. The selection of teachers in private schools in the application section was carried out with the recommended decision support method. It has been shown that the proposed method can be successfully used as a decision support model.

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 920
Cite : 8.525
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index