User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 72
 Downloands 15
Teknoloji Kullanım Alışkanlığı Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları
2020
Journal:  
Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu araştırmanın amacı, teknoloji kullanım alışkanları çerçevesinde kullanıcıların teknoloji bağımlılık semptom düzeylerini ölçmeye yönelik, güvenirliği ve geçerliği yüksek bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. İlgili alan yazın taranarak teknoloji kullanımıyla ilgili 65 madde araştırmacı tarafından ele alınmış ve hazırlanan uzman görüş formu ile 5 uzmana danışılmıştır. Alınan uzman görüşü ve yapılan ön çalışmalar doğrultusunda 32 madde ve 6 kategorili olarak derecelendirilen ölçek 948 teknoloji kullanıcısına uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini saptamak amacıyla temel bileşenler analizi ile faktör analizi yapılmış ve varimax dik döndürme işlemi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu analizler sonucunda 6 faktörlü (kullanım ve zaman, teknolojik istila, bağımlılığı benimseme, teknolojik saplantı, iletişim sarmalı, ruhsal ve zihinsel değişkenler) toplam varyansın %59.043’ünü açıklayan ölçek elde edilmiştir. Cronbach α (0.92) katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. T testi kullanılarak yapılan (alt-üst %27) analizler sonucu maddelerin ve faktörlerin ayırt edici olduğu saptanmıştır. Devamlılık katsayısı için ölçek dört hafta arayla aynı gruba uygulanmış ve korelasyon katsayısı anlamlı bulunmuştur (r=.78 p<.001). Elde edilen sonuçlar ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu kanıtlar niteliktedir. 

Keywords:

Development of the Scale of Usability of Technology: validity and reliability studies
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this research is to develop a high reliability and validity measurement tool aimed at measuring the levels of technology addiction symptoms of users within the framework of technology usage habits. The relevant field in the summer was scanned by 65 researchers related to the use of technology and consulted 5 experts with the prepared expert opinion form. According to the expert opinion received and the preliminary studies carried out, the scale of 32 items and 6 categories has been applied to 948 technology users. To determine the structure validity of the measurement, the analysis of the basic components and the factor analysis were carried out and the varimax straight reversion process was carried out. These analyses resulted in a scale that describes the total variation of 6 factors (use and time, technological invasion, addiction adoption, technological disturbance, communication curve, mental and mental variables) of 59,043%. The Cronbach α (0.92) is calculated. Analysis using the T test (about 27%) found that the substances and factors were distinguishing. The scale for the continuity rate was applied to the same group between four weeks and the correlation rate was found meaningful (r=.78; p<.001). The results obtained are as evidence that the scale is valid and reliable.

Keywords:

Developing The Technology Use Habits Scale: Validity and Reliability Studies
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this study is to develop a high reliability and validity measurement tool for measure technology addiction symptom levels of users within the framework of technology usage habits. 65 items related to the use of technology were arranged by the researcher and 5 experts were consulted with the expert opinion form prepared. According to the expert opinion and preliminary studies, the scale which was rated as 32 items and 6 categories, was applied to 948 technology users. As a result of the analyzes, 6 factors (usage and time, technological invasion, adoption of dependence, technological obsession, communication spiral, mental and mental variables) was obtained. Cronbach α (0.92) coefficients were calculated for reliability. The results of the analysis conducted using the T test (bottom-top 27%) showed that the substances and factors were distinctive. For the continuity coefficient, the scale was applied to the same group after four weeks and the correlation coefficient was significant (r = .78; p <.001). The results show that the scale is valid and reliable.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 478
Cite : 4.802
2023 Impact : 0.185
Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi