Özet:

The novel concepts of Ahmet Mithat and Halit Ziya, if it’s in place, the base is the basin. The speed in the development of the VAK, with a few lines in the paintings/brushing and therefore satisfying with a sketch, distance from the worries of creating character, influencing the reader/manipulate meyal narrative/telling and in connection with it, the character’s measurement and discourse in the moral thesis in the narrative. The subject of betting is the assessment of emotions. The important events in the romanticism of Ahmet Mithat take place in the outside world, while the romanticism of Halit Ziya takes place in the inner world. The novel type is defined from the very beginning; with the original devotion to the fictional/non-real/supernatural and this definition is accepted as a postulat for A. Mithat, the novelist at the top, the author of Monte Kristo Contu is Alexandre Dumas. Halit Ziya, the prominent names of the realistic and naturalist ecole, directed his interest in the Balzac, Flaubert and Goncourt Brothers, gives evidence of his discoveries about the novel from them. He is in the novel in the face of the idealism and the actions of the idealism, directed by the idealism. He even speaks of such kinds, laughing and horrors. These two writers' important clues about the novel concepts are found in Ahbar-i Asara Tamim-i Enzar and Story. This article will first focus on the clues about 'roman' and 'romancy' in the two books, and then will look closer to the romance of the two writers by moving from the Seven Years and Sefile novels.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet:

Ahmet Mithat and Halit Ziya have diametrically opposite perspective on novel, as the phrase goes. The swiftness of the course of events, contenting themselves with only few flicks/ brushstrokes and consequently with the only one draft, far from the concern of creating a (consistent and real) character, narration inclined to impressing/manipulating the reader, the narrator and affiliated to this, pondering the characters in the moral scale in the narrative. Whereas these sorts of similar elements are the distinctive features of Ahmet Mithat fiction, deepening at a point what Ahmet Mithat almost never deliberates is the characteristics and distinctiveness of Halit Ziya's novelism. The characteristic in question is the analysis of emotions. Important events take place in the outside world in Ahmet Mithat’s novels, while they happen in the inner world in Halit Ziya's. For Ahmet Mithat who describes his novel genre originally adherence to the imaginary/unrealistic/dreamy one and who acknowledges this description as a postulate, the uppermost novelist is Alexander Dumas, the author of Monte Cristo to Ahmet Mithat. On the other hand, Halit Ziya directs his attention to Balzac, Flaubert and The Goncourt Brothers who are the prominent names of realist and naturalist schools, and brings evidence from them to the determination about novel. He is opposed to idealism in novel and to those whose actions are directed and interpreted by idealism. He even mentions such ones with ridicule and contempt. The significant clues to the perspective of these two authors are included in their books, Ahbar-ı Asara Tamim-i Enzar and Hikâye. In this writing, above all, the clues about ‘novel’ and ‘novelism’ in the books will be dwelled on at issue. Thereafter, the novelism of the two authors will be taken a closer look based on the novels, Henüz On Yedi Yaşında and Sefile.