Abstract:

The two most important signs in the history of the early period, aberī and Mātürīdī, were curious about their approaches to similar issues and their position against each other because they lived in the same period and faced largely the same problems. In the history of the pre-tefsīr, though the names that could reach the tfsirs like Muḳātil b. Solomon were mentioned to the present day, the shaping effect on the tfsir history of aberī was undoubtedly greater. The interpretation date created by taking to the center of aberī has caused more losses than the benefits. The sight of Hicri in the third century has prevented us from knowing how Hicri was seen from the outside in the same period as effective in our recognition of Hicri. It is believed that it is possible to overcome this problem by the author by reading the period with the eyes of another inspector in the same period. This article in your hand has to be heard to be translated because it summarizes the point where the aberī-based interpretation works in the West came from the date of its publication and suggests a reading beyond the usual for the third century.

Keywords: