Özet:

When you look at the formation of the meshheps, it seems that the works that the founder Imam writes or dictates have a very important position. These works make up the foundation of the religious. In the past, the works that assessed the differences between the religious leaders were taken into account. After that, he was able to find out what he did, and what he did, and what he did, and what he did, and what he did, and what he did. All of these works create the religious literature and ensure the institutionalization of the religious and the formation of the usual tradition. One of the most important works of Hanefî literature is Merginânî’s al-Hidâye. This work has become one of the most basic books applied in the Hanefî religion and has been done on a lot of work. In this book he has chosen the most reliable opinions in the Hanefî religion, and has occasionally mentioned the evidence of these opinions. He is often in the name of the righteous, in the name of the righteous. But some of these hadiths used in al-Hidâye have been exposed to some criticism. These critics in the beginning of the matter are weak, not passed in the hadith sources, Hz. to the Prophet (s.a.s.) not to be admitted. The guidelines are coming. Those who are in the midst of the covenant are the ones who are in the midst of the covenant, and those who are in the midst of the covenant are the ones who are in the midst. But some of them, who are in the midst of the covenant, are the ones who are in the midst of the covenant, and they are not the ones who are in the midst of the covenant, but the ones who are in the midst of the covenant. One of the wise men who criticized the hadiths in al-Hidâye is Ali al-Kari. Al-Qaeda is a well-educated scientist in the religious fields, including fighters and hadith fields. It is a good thing to do, and it is a good thing to do, and it is a good thing to do, it is a good thing to do, it is a good thing to do. One of the works of Ali al-Kari’s forums in the fıkıh area is Fethu Bâbi’l-Inâye. First of all, this book is the name of the book, which is one of the works made on El-Hidâye. In his work, Ali al-Kari recalled the testimony of the Hanefî mezhebi and assessed the testimony of the Hanefî scientists. In this way, he has been able to do so, and he has been able to do so, and he has been able to do so, and he has been able to do so, and he has been able to do so. Ali al-Kari, also because he was a muhaddis, addressed these hadits by movement from the hadith sources and evaluated according to the information in these sources. Al-Kari al-Hidâye, after receiving his criticism of the hadiths in Al-Kari al-Hidâye, pointed out that some hadiths were revived with different words, with various taricts, and mentioned the sources of these hadiths. He also discusses the righteousness of the righteous, and the righteousness of the righteous, and the righteousness of the righteous. It is also interesting that the work of Ali al-Kari’s criticism of the rivages in al-Hidâye is a work done on al-Hidâye.

Özet:

On looking at the emergence process of mazhabs, one can see that the works that the founder imam wrote or dictated have a very important place, as these works form the bases of the mazhab. In the following times, works that evaluate the disagreements between the leading imams of the mazhab were penned. Later on, works that justfy the mazhab’s views and explain the proofs that these views are baesd on, emerged. All these studies form the mazhabic literature and provide the mazhab’s institutionalization and its methodological formation. One of the important works of Hanefian literature is Al-Hidayah by Marginani. The work has been one of the basic reference books and lots of studies have been done on it. In this work, Marginani collects the most reliable views in Hanefian mazhab and he presents the proofs of some views. On looking at the work, one sees that hadithes are often used as a proof. However some hadithes used in Al-Hidayah has been exposed to some critisizm. The chief critisizm is that the hadithes in question are weak, that they are not found in hatdith sources and that they are not attributed to the Prophet and so on. Hadithes  that are used as an evidence in Al-Hidayah have been citisized by many scholars from different mazhabs. In addition, some scholars from Hanefian mazhab have critised these hadithes and stated that it is not possible to use them as an evidence. One of the scholars from Hanefian mazhab who critisizes the hadithes in Al-Hidayah is Ali Al-Qari. Ali Al-Qari is a well-educated scholar in religious studies especially in Hadith and Fıqh (İslamic Jurisprudence) and his highly competent works that he has penned in different branches confirm his quality. One of Ali Al-Qari’s works penned in furu al- fıqh (subject matters in Islamic jurisprudence) is Fethu Bab Al- Inayah. Firstly, this work is the sharh (detailed explanation) of the book called Nukayah, one of the studies done on Al-Hidayah. In his work, Ali Al-Qari tells the evidences of Hanfian mazhab and evaluates the evidences used by Hanefian scholars by frequently mentioning Al-Hidayah and critisizing the hadithes put forward by Marginani. Being an hadith expert as well, Ali Al-Qari evaluates these hadithes within hadith terminology. After penning his critique on the hadithes in Al-Hidayah, Ali Al-Qari states that one particular hadith is transmitted in different words and in different narrating channels (tariq) by informing the reference sources of these transmissions (rivayah). The author also evaluates the narraters (ravi) in question and ashab (prophet’s friends) mentioned in these transmissions and discusses these transmissions’ evidential value. It is also interesting that this work by Ali Al-Qari in which he presents his critique on the hadith reports is a study that has been done on Al-Hidayah.

Anahtar Kelimeler: