Özet:

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the ethical decision-making status of the staff at the management level at the university differs in terms of a number of variables. In this research, which is of the characteristic nature, the survey technique has been used as a method of data collection. The research used the “ethical decision-making scale” and the “personal information form” as a data collection tool. In the analysis of the obtained data, the Mann-Whitney U Test was used for comparisons between the two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis Varyans Analysis for multi-group comparisons. In many comparisons, when the result of the Kruskal Wallis Varyans Analysis makes a significant difference, the Mann Whitney U Test was applied to determine which groups of these differences arise. In the analysis of the demographic data, the methods of frequency and percentage were used. The study concluded that the ethical decision-making perceptions of the staff at the management level at the university did not differ significantly according to the gender variable (p=0,130>0,05), and that there was a significant difference in the under-dimensional cooperation (p=0,049<0,05) in terms of civil status. Again, according to the educational status variable, ethical decision (p=0,020<0,05), love subdimensional (p=0,034<0,05) and justice subdimensional (p=0,017<0,05) are significantly different.

Özet:

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the ethical decision-making status of the staff working at the university's executive level differs in terms of some variables. In this descriptive study, the questionnaire technique was used as a data collection method. "Ethical decision making scale" and "personal information form" were used as data collection tools in the study. In the analysis of the data obtained, Mann-Whitney U Test was used for comparisons between two independent groups and Kruskal Wallis Variance Analysis for multi-group comparisons. In cases where a significant difference was found as a result of Kruskal Wallis Variance Analysis in multiple comparisons, Mann Whitney U Test was used to determine which groups this difference originated from. Frequency and percentage methods were used in the analysis of the data regarding demographic data. As a result of the study, it was seen that the perceptions of ethical decision-making of the staff working at the university administration level did not differ significantly according to the gender variable (p = 0.130> 0.05), and there was a significant difference in the sub-dimension of cooperation in terms of marital status (p = 0.049 <0.05). . It was also concluded that there was a significant difference in terms of ethical decision making (p = 0.020 <0.05), affection sub-dimension (p = 0.034 <0.05) and justice sub-dimension (p = 0.017 <0.05) according to the educational level variable.

Anahtar Kelimeler: