Özet:

Deciding is the choice of one of the various alternatives, as a result of mental processes. These mental processes can become much more difficult under pressure and in changing conditions. Arbitration can be defined as the decision to be made professionally correctly if possible in time. In this study, the aim is to explore the hentai judges’ stils of decision making based on some variables. The examples of the study are made up of a total of 85 judges in the various provinces of Turkey who are elected through the appropriate sample of the A, B and C classmates of the provincial judges and candidate judges in the Hentbol leagues. The study used the "Melbourne Decision Scale" and the personal information form developed by researchers. SPSS 25 for statistical analysis. The statistical package program has been used. Since the data was shown to be compatible with normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), the t test, Anova and Tuckey test were used in statistical analysis and the meaning level was determined as .05. As a result, there was a significant difference between the ratings of the Huntball judges by gender in terms of total self-righteousness and total decision-making styles. Decision styles total points and decision substiles delaying decision, panic decision points according to training conditions, decision substiles careful decision points according to judgment stages, decision substiles panic decision points according to age conditions compared with significant differences between them.

Anahtar Kelimeler: