User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 56
 Downloands 8
COMPARISON OF IRT MODELS WITH DIFFERENT GUESSING PARAMETERS
2021
Journal:  
LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract: The Three-Parameter Logistic (3PL) model have some advantages over the other Item Response Theory (IRT) models for multiple-choice testing. Under the 3PL model, an examinee with no knowledge can correctly answer an item at the probability of the value of the c-parameter. The propensity for the guessing effect is the same for all ability levels under 3PL models. However, the idea of ability-based guessing has been asserted. In this study, different IRT models for which the guessing parameters are considered in different ways were elaborated. Also, the IRT models were compared with each other via a simulation study and an empirical data set. The results were compared based on item parameter estimation bias and RMSE. Based on the results, the FG3PL model gave the worst results (i.e., larger bias and RMSE) compared to other models. C3PL model was fine when the simulated data were generated by the 2PL model, but not by 3PL data.

Keywords:

null
2021
Author:  
0
2021
Author:  
Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 164
Cite : 626
LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi