Bu çalışmada spor bilimleri dergilerindeki sporda sosyal alanlar makalelerinin araştırma yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Makalelerin araştırma konularında, yöntemlerinde, desenlerinde, veri toplama tekniklerinde ve araştırma alanlarında hangi yaklaşımların benimsendiği belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma tekniklerinden doküman inceleme tekniği seçilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında spor bilimleri alanında en az on yıldır süreli akademik yayın yapan üç dergi incelenmiştir. 1990-2016 tarihleri arasında, sporda sosyal alanlarda yayınlanmış 400 makale, araştırma yöntemi, araştırma deseni, veri toplama teknikleri ve araştırma konuları başlıkları çerçevesinde sınıflandırılmış 1990-1999, 2000-2009 ve 2010-2016 olmak üzere üç tarihsel dönem çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Kategorize edilen veriler, içerik analizi ve betimleyici istatistik kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, 400 makalenin %78’i nicel, %13,2’si nitel araştırma yöntemi ile %8,8’i derleme niteliğinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Nicel araştırma yöntemleriyle gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda ilişkisel tarama %68,6 ile en çok tasarlanan araştırma deseni iken, çalışmaların %78,2’inde veri toplama aracı olarak ölçek kullanılmıştır. 400 makalenin %55,5’i spor psikolojisi %20,8’i spor yönetimi %13,5’i spor sosyolojisi ve %6,3’ü rekreasyon alanlarında yayımlanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, baskın metodolojik yaklaşımın nicel yöntem olduğunu, araştırmaların sıklıkla ilişkisel tarama desenleri çerçevesinde ve ölçek formları ile planlandığını, nitel araştırma yöntemlerine ait desenlerin oldukça geri planda olduğunu ve sporda sosyal alanlarda en çok çalışmanın spor psikolojisi alanında yapıldığını göstermektedir.
This study aims to study the research approaches of social fields articles in sports in sports sciences magazines. It has been tried to determine which approaches are adopted in the research subjects, methods, patterns, data collection techniques and research fields. The research technique is selected from the quality research techniques. The research has been conducted by three magazines that have been published academically for at least a decade in the field of sports sciences. Between 1990 and 2016, 400 articles published in the social fields of sport, research methods, research designs, data collection techniques and research subjects were classified in the framework of the titles; they were studied in the framework of three historical periods, 1990-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2016. Categorized data is analyzed using content analysis and illustrative statistics. According to the results of the analysis, 78% of 400 articles were qualitative, 13.2% with quality research method; 8.8% were accomplished as a compilation. Relative scanning was the most designed research model in studies with the Nicel research methods with 68.6%, while scale was used as a data collection tool in 78.2%. 55,5% of the 400 articles were published in sports psychology; 20.8% in sports management; 13.5% in sports sociology and 6.3% in recreation. The results of the research show that the dominant methodological approach is a quantum method, that the research is often planned in the framework of relative scan patterns and scale forms, that the patterns of quality research methods are quite back-planned, and that the most of the study in the social fields in sport is done in the field of sports psychology.
This study was aimed to examine the methodological approaches of the articles in the social aspects of sports in the journals of sport sciences. In the research methods, design, data collection tools and sub-discipline of the articles were investigated. Document analysis was used in the study. Three journals, which have been publishing articles at least ten years, in the field of sport sciences have been examined. Between 1990 and 2016, 400 articles in the social field of sports sciences were classified based on subject, research methods, design, data collection tools and research areas. These articles were examined in three historical periods; 1990- 1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2016. The classified data was analyzed by using content and descriptive analysis. The findings showed that 78% of the 400 articles were quantitative, 13,2% were qualitative research method, and 8,8% of the articles were review. In studies conducted with quantitative research methods, correlational design was mostly used research design with 68,6%, in 78,2% of the studies, scale was used as data collection tool. The findings showed that articles were frequently conducted in different sub-disciplines such as sport psychology (55,5%), sport management (20,8%), sport sociology (13,5%) and recreation (6,3%). The results indicated that quantitative methodology is dominant in the social disciplines of sport. Moreover, researches are frequently planned with correlational design by using scales as data collection tools. Qualitative method designs remain in the background and sports psychology is most studying sub discipline of social field of sports sciences.
Alan : Spor Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|