User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 83
 Downloands 14
TÜRKİYE VE ERMENİSTAN İLİŞKİLERİNDE NAHÇIVAN SORUNU
2018
Journal:  
Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Türkiye, 1921 yılında imzalanan Moskova ve Kars Antlaşmaları ile Azerbaycan’ın korucuyuluğundaki Nahçıvan Özerk Bölgesi’nin garantör ülkesi olmuştur. 1992 yılında Ermeni milis kuvvetlerin, Nahçıvan’ın idari bölgesi Sederek’e saldırmaları ile Türkiye ve Ermenistan arasında dış politika krizi ortaya çıkmıştır. İki ülke arasındaki kriz dönemi Nahçıvan’daki çatışmaların yoğun bir şekilde yaşandığı 1992-1993 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Nahçıvan krizinin dinamiklerini, Türk ve Ermeni karar alıcılarının kriz dönemindeki söylemlerini ve kullandıkları siyasi, diplomatik ve askeri araçları analiz etmektedir. Bu makale, Azerbaycan ve Ermenistan arasında ortaya çıkan teritoryal sorunun Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkilerine etkisini inceleyerek literatüre özgün bir katkı yapmaktadır.

Keywords:

The Nakhcivan Problem In Turkey-armenian Relations
2018
Author:  
Abstract:

Turkey became a guarantor state of the Nakhcivan Autonomous Region which is under the authority of Azerbaijan with the Moscow and Kars Treaties which were signed in 1921. A foreign policy crisis emerged between Turkey and Armenia when Armenian insurgents attacked Sadarak, an administrative region of Nakhcıvan in 1992. The crisis period covers the years of 1992-1992 throughout which an intense fighting took place in Nakhcıvan. This study analyzes the Nakchıvan crisis’ dyamics, Turkish and Armenian decision makers’ discourses and political, diplomatic, and military tools they utilized during the crisis period. By studying the impact of the territorial dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia on TurkishArmenian relations, this paper makes an original contribution to the literature.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 537
Cite : 1.887
2023 Impact : 0.057
Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi