Views
18
Downloands
7
İbn Ebî Arûbe’nin (ö. 156/773) telif ettiği Kitâbü’l-Menâsik, Basra’da tasnif edilen ilk hadis kitapları arasındadır. Hicrî ikinci asırda hadis ve fıkıh ilminin gelişimine katkı sağlayan söz konusu eserin isnad yapısı ve rivayet yönteminin tahlili büyük önem taşımaktadır. İlk tasnifler arasında olmasına rağmen bu eseri tasnif, metin ve rivayet açısından ele alan yeterli nitelikte çalışmalar yapılmamıştır. Bu nedenle konuyla ilgili ilk makalemizde tasnif ve metin unsurları yönüyle ele alınan Menâsik, burada kaynak dağılımı, mürsel, mübhem ve münkatı‘ rivayetleri ile diğer sened özelliklerinin yanı sıra rivayet usul ve üslubu gibi açılardan analiz edildi. Eserin hadis tarihi ve edebiyatındaki konumunun daha net bir şekilde tespiti için temel noktalarda aynı dönemin farklı bölgelerde öne çıkan eserleri ile karşılaştırma yoluna gidildi. Çalışmada günümüze tam olarak ulaşamayan Menâsik’in, sened ve rivayet özellikleri açısından aynı yüzyılda telif edilen çalışmalarla yakın özellikler taşıdığı görülmüştür. Eser, hicrî ikinci asrın sünnet anlayışına uygun bir şekilde merfû ve mevkuf olanları içermekle birlikte ağırlıklı olarak maktû rivayetlerden oluşmaktadır. Menâsik, hicrî ikinci yüzyılın ilk yarısında kaleme alınan kitaplardan biri olarak %30,5 oranında münkatı‘, mürsel ve mübhem türünde muttasıl olmayan senedler barındırır. Bu durum müellifin ders halkasının, bilgileri sahibine dayandırma noktasındaki genel mütesâhil tavırlarıyla ilişkilidir. Eseri telif ederken İbn Ebî Arûbe’nin, doğrudan bir yazılı kaynaktan rivayet aldığına dair elimizde açık bir bilgi bulunmamakla birlikte müellifin, teorik düzlemde bu konuda bir sorun görmediği ve fiziki olarak da elinde yeterli yazılı kaynak bulunduğu anlaşılmıştır.
by Ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him) 156/773 The Book of Menâsik, which he has written, is one of the first hadith books that are classified in Basra. In the second century, Hicri contributes to the development of the hadith and fıkıh knowledge, the structure of the subject work and the evaluation of the method of rivayet are of great importance. Although it was among the first tasnifs, this work was not done in sufficient quality in terms of tasnif, text and rivayet. Therefore, in our first article on the subject, the Menâsik, which was addressed in the direction of the tasnif and text elements, was analysed here from points such as resource distribution, mürsel, mubhem and münkatı's rivayet and other sened characteristics as well as the rivayet procedure and style. In order to clearly identify the position of the work in the history and literature of the hadith, the main points of the same period were to be compared with the works that appear in different regions of the same period. The study found that Menâsik, which is not fully reached to the present day, carries close characteristics with the works written in the same century in terms of the characteristics of sened and rivayet. In the second verse of the Qur’an, the Qur’an was revealed in the Qur’an, and the Qur’an was revealed in the Qur’an, and the Qur’an was revealed in the Qur’an. Menâsik, as one of the books published in the first half of the second century, contains 30,5 percent of münkatı, mürsel and mukhem non-muttashl scenes. This situation is related to the attitude of the teacher's classroom, the general interim attitude at the point of giving the knowledge to the owner. When writing the work, we have no clear information that Ibn Abî Arûbe has received from a written source, but the author has not seen a problem in the theoretical level and physically has enough written source in his hands.
Written by Abū al-Nadr Sa‘īd ibn Abī ‘Arūba al-‘Adawī (d. 156/773), Kitāb al-Manāsik is one of the first hadith books classified in Baṣrah. The analysis of the isnād structure and narration method of this book has great importance in terms of the development of the sciences of hadith and fiqh. Not enough studies have dealt with this work in terms of classification, text, narration style, and sanad [chain of transmission]. For this reason, my first article on the subject discussed Kitāb al-Manāsik in terms of classification and text. The current article, however, analyzes Kitāb al-Manāsik in terms of its source structure, diversity, and narration design. In order to determine the position this work has in hadith history and the literature more clearly, the article compares it with the prominent works of the same period in terms of some basic points. Kitāb al-Manāsik has not fully survived to the present day and has characteristics similar to the works that were compiled in the same century. Kitāb al-Manāsik involves hadiths marfū‘ [attributed only to the Prophet] and mawqūf [attributed to a companion], but mainly consists of hadith makṭū‘ [attributed to a successor of the companions]. Of the hadiths in Kitāb al-Manāsik, 30.5% have the munqaṭi‘ [interrupted], mursal [sent/transmitted missing a companion] or mubham [involving an unknown person] types of defective isnād. This situation relates to the general soft attitude of the author’s hadith circle. No clear information exists that Abū al-Nadr had transmitted directly from a written source. However, the hadith assembly in with which he was involved was known to have had a more liberal attitude on this point. Abū al-Nadr, who has sufficient written sources, does not see any theoretical problem in this regard.
Field : İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
