Atıf Sayısı
3
Görüntüleme
47
İndirme
12
Nassları sahih bir şekilde anlama ve anlamlandırmanın yolu, klasik fıkıh usûlü eserlerinde istinbât metodları dediğimiz kısımda incelenmektedir. Bu bölümde, nasslarda karşılaştığımız lafız çeşitlerinden biri olan müşterek de ele alınmaktadır. Birden fazla manaya sahip olup bu manalarından her biri için ayrı ayrı vaz’ edilmiş bir lafız olan müşterek, Kitap ve Sünnet nasslarında kullanılmıştır. Vaz’ edildiği manalardan hangisinin Şari’in maksadı olduğu konusu, usûlcülerin ihtilaf etmelerine sebep olduğu gibi müşterek ile ilgili öne çıkan tartışmalardan biri de umumu’l-müşterek meselesidir. Kısaca müşterek ile vaz’ edildiği manalardan hepsini birden kastetmenin mümkün olup olmaması şeklinde ifade edebileceğimiz söz konusu mesele de usûlcüler arasındaki önemli tartışma konularından biridir. Kavramın usûl eserlerindeki izahı, hakkındaki ihtilaflı görüşler, deliller ve konuyla ilgili meşhur örnekler bu çalışmada ele alınmış olan hususlardır. Ayrıca klasik usûl eserlerinde zikredilen ama konuya münasip olmadığı düşünülen bazı örneklerin kritiği de yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmayla, anılan kavramın mahiyetini netleştirmek, klasik eserlerdeki bazı örneklerin konuya uygun olmadığını ortaya koymak ve nihayet konuyla ilgili ihtilaflı görüşlerden birini tercih etmek hedeflenmektedir. Böylece fer’î fıkıh meselelerindeki önemli ihtilaf sebeplerinden ve fıkıh usûlünün de temel kavramlarından biri olan umûmu’l-müşterek konusu ve bunun imkân dâhilinde olamayacağı, sistematik bir şekilde sunularak vüzûha kavuşturulmaya çalışılacaktır.
The way of understanding and understanding the Nasses in a genuine way is studied in the classical fictional works of the instinct methods. In this section, one of the varieties of words we encounter in the Nass is also discussed by the customer. It has several meanings and is a separate word for each of these meanings, used in the Book and Sünnet nasses. The question of which of the signs of Vaz is the purpose of the Shari, as it causes the prosecutors to dispute; one of the outgoing discussions about the client is the question of the public-client. In short, the question that we can express in the form of whether it is possible to mean all of the meanings of the client and the usual is one of the important issues of discussion between the prosecutors. The explanation of the concept in the work of the process, the controversial opinions about it, the evidence and the famous examples of the subject are the facts discussed in this study. There are also examples of the classical work mentioned, but some examples considered not relevant to the subject were also criticized. This study aims to clarify the nature of the aforementioned concept, to show that some examples in classical works are not appropriate to the subject, and ultimately to choose one of the controversial views on the subject. Thus, from the important reasons of the controversy in the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy.
The way to understand and make sense of the nass (divine decrees) soundly is examined in the section called istinbât (rational inference) methods in the classical works of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). In this section, one of the words that we encounter in divine decrees, müşterek is also discussed. The term müşterek, which has more than one meaning and has been imposed for each meaning, was used in divine decrees of the Book and Sunnah. The issue of which meaning of müşterek is intended by Şari has been a reason for the disputes between scholars of usul al-fiqh (Islamic practice). Furthermore, the issue of umumu’l-müşterek has been one of the most prominent discussions about müşterek. The issue in question, which we can briefly explain that whether it is possible to address all of the meanings of müşterek imposed, is one of the important debate topics among the scholars of usul al-fiqh. The explanation of the concept in the works of usul, the controversial views on it, the evidence, and the famous examples related to the subject are the issues discussed in this study. Besides, some examples that are mentioned in classical usul al-fiqh works but considered to be nonrelevant for the subject will also be criticized. In this study, it is aimed to clarify the nature of the aforementioned concept, to reveal that some examples in classical works are not relevant to the subject, and finally choose one of the controversial views on the subject. Thus, the topic of umûmu’l-müşterek, one of the important causes of conflict in subsidiary (fer’i) jurisprudence matters and one of the basic concepts of usul al-fiqh and its impossibility will be clarified by presenting the subject systematically.
Alan : İlahiyat
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
