Abstract:

In Turkish it means “unemployed, unemployed, unemployed, unemployed.” Flaner (Flaner) derived from the French phlaner, which is a concept that emerged in the 19th century, meaning "the light, the city, the thought traveler". According to Russel, the class that emerges with modernity is a class that develops art, finds science, and raises philosophical thoughts. In the Turkish novels of Tanzimat since the years "alafranga züppe type" was first processed in the novel of Yusuf Atılgan's Aylak Adam in the meaning of a flaneur (flaneur), which is superficially processed in the form of "alafranga züppe type". The novel is C. This novel, in which a kind of manifest of disadvantage is addressed, the concept of disadvantage is questioned, has been inspired by this article, in which the word disadvantage, which also meets the meaning of "thinking traveler" in addition to the meaning of "unemployed, vacant traveler (no one)" is studied. The article focuses on the perception of the etymological and semantic historical course of the ancient Turkish word from Turkish to Turkish through the study of the etymological and semantic historical course of the Turkish word in the dictionaries and in the historical sources of Turkish. In the article, the word “unemployed, empty traveling avare (no one)” is used in the historical periods of Turkish and contemporary languages in the words “free, empty, empty, empty, free, heart, the empty where the heart is; entrance, Gulf, rithm, port” and in the mouth “unreasonable, free, empty, open, clear, clear; a month held worker, servant; open, challenge; the animal that pulls water from the deep hills returns, the way where it comes, the land, the water used in the field, the workless.” According to this, the meaning of "thinking traveler" in the philosophical and literary field has not been included in the dictionaries has been concluded that this meaning has not found much responsibility in the people's presence, that the identity of the distinction has been thinly identified, that the distinction class in us has not played an effective role in the development of civilization as in the West.

Keywords:

Abstract:

In Turkish, the word aylak means “loafer, roamer, slacker (person)”. In French, on the other hand, the word flâneur is derived from the verb flâner, which means to waste time, to idle around. The derived word was coined in the 19th century, and has been associated with an idler intellectual, urban idle, thinker. According to Russell, the idler class which emerged after modernism is a class of people who develop the arts, contribute to science, and come up with philosophical ideas. Idlers as stock characters used to be superficially represented as European-style snobs in Turkish novels since Tanzimat era until Yusuf Atılgan’s novel Aylak Adam (The Loiterer) in which the word idler is used to connotate the same meaning as flaneur in French. That novel has been an inspiration to this study in that the novel deals with the term idleness and questions the term through its main character C., who is represented as an idler but a thinker at the same time. This study deals with the terms aylak/aylaklık by studying the etymological and semantic change in the use of the words in historical texts both in Old Turkish and in Turkish. It has been discovered that the word aylak not only means idler, loafer but also connotates “off-task, free; naughty; lazy; free of charge, gratuitous; heart, the gap that heart stands in; whirlpool; gulf” in the historical scheme of Turkish. Also, in Turkish dialects, the word has different meanings, such as “unrequited, free; clear, obvious; worker or servant who is held for a month, square; the road in which the animal draws water from deep wells, turns and commute, well used for irrigation of fields, unemployed.” Based on the data obtained, the reason that the meaning of “thinker traveler” of aylak gained in philosophical and literary fields is not included in dictionaries is that this meaning does not correspond very much in the eyes of the people, idleness is identified with laziness, and that the idle class does not play an active role in Turkey during the development of civilization as in the West.