Özet:

When Karl Popper was regarded as a thinker who founded his philosophy on the principle of falsificability and imposed this imagination on all lines of the system, he mostly in all his speeches demonstrated a position against the principle of validity that the Logistic Positivist thought has attributed to scientific truths. In essence, the Logicist, along with the preconceptions of the positivist thought, has also strongly criticized the understanding of the scientific method and the scientific principle they have adopted. Moving from the critical ground, Popper, in contrast to all this framework he sees problematic, also ensures the positioning of the principle of errability within his own system. In scientific studies, the principle of falsificability, which has been considered as the main principle, has aimed at addressing all the knowledge ground that will be formed until its own period, if necessary, after the period, the principle has been presented as the main measure of the scientific nature. So that the principle of falsificability, which constitutes the most important phase in our ability to talk about the science of a proposal, comes to us. Our study consists of two main topics, the first part is based on the nature of scientific truths that evolve according to the scientific philosophy, while the second part is based on the detailing of the principle of falsificability within the scientific philosophy and on what framework it is placed in the Popper perspective.