Özet:

Scientific research is very valuable in terms of the dissemination of science, sharing it with other researchers and the development of intellectual accumulation. Scientific publishing, which is responsible for the sharing and dissemination of scientific research, in other words, academic magazine publishing is a type of publishing that has come to us with a rapidly rising momentum in recent years. This study was carried out with the aim of revealing the experiences of the editors, judges and writers, which are the components of the publication process in educational magazines, from their own perspective and giving suggestions from these data. For this purpose, a quality research has been carried out in the case study model. On the basis of the scan of the area made, the questions to be addressed to the editors, judges and writers who have experienced the publication process in educational magazines have been determined and a semi-configured interview form containing parallel questions for each has been prepared. Covid measures and discussions were conducted online because the researchers and participants were in different cities of Turkey. The data was obtained through conversations through the Zoom platform. In the analysis of data, the content analysis technique has been used. In the process of the study of the data set, the analytical technique of the tuberculosis is based on the data, determining the codes, sub-themes and themes. Themes, subthemes and codes are given in the form of a table and are supported by direct quotation phrases. Research findings show that publishers, judges and writers, as part of the scientific publishing process, have expressed common views in some points and divergent views in some points. Considering that the process contains responsibilities related to one another, it can be said that the evaluation of the same situation from other aspects reveals the data that will allow the development of the scientific publishing process. In addition to the opinions of the editors, judges and authors on their own processes, it has emerged the opinions that the directory provides a certain standard, that in some points it leads to scientific unification, and that systems that have the same function as the advanced technology. From the views on the tasks of the editors who are at the main point of the process, the conclusion is that this task contributes both in terms of career and academic development. The opinions that the arbitration duty should be considered as academic responsibility, as well as the work burden it brings, have been stated that the elements that will increase the motivation for the performance of this duty are needed.

Anahtar Kelimeler: