Görüntüleme
108
İndirme
20
“Sanatın Sonu” söylemleri sanat alanında artık pek rağbet görmemekte, çünkü son zamanlarda sonu gelebilecek ve dolayısıyla yeni bir anlatı dili geliştirilebilecek bir sanat alanından bahsetmek pek mümkün gözükmemektedir. Sanat tarihinde hem Duchamp hem de Warhol için bu söylemler sıkça dile getirilmiş ancak sanat alanına kendi dönemlerinde nefes aldıran bu iki isim, yaptıklarının farkında olarak ya da olmayarak bu söylemlere pek kulak asmamışlardır. Zaman içerisinde de ne kadar haklı oldukları, sanatın belli kalıplara sığmak gibi bir zorunluluğu olmadığı ve sanat algısının da değişebileceği gözler önüne serilmiştir. Sadece tek bir sorun vardır, o da değişen sanat algısı ve sanatçının yaptığı her şey sanattır anlayışı sonu gelmez bir tekrara düşecek ve içinden çıkılmaz bir hal almaya başlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada Duchamp ve Warhol üzerinden yapılan sanat söylemlerinden yola çıkılarak “sanatın sonu” çanlarının süreç içerisinde neden çalamaz hale geldiği irdelenmektedir.
The words "The End of Art" are no longer much missing in the field of art, because it seems not possible to talk about a field of art that could come to an end in recent times and therefore develop a new narrative language. In the history of art, both Duchamp and Warhol have often spoken these statements, but these two names, who have breathed into the field of art in their own periods, have not listened much to these statements, whether or not they are aware of what they do. It has been revealed in time how right they are, the art has no obligation to fit certain patterns, and the art perception can also change. There is only one problem, it will also change the perception of art and the artist’s understanding of everything is art, and it will fall once again, and it will begin to take an inevitable state. In this study, it is questioned why the “fin of art” sounds are not playing during the process, starting from the art speeches made through Duchamp and Warhol.
The discourses about “the end of art” are not favored much anymore, because there is no definition of art that can be claimed to have come to an end recently. Over the course of art history these kind of arguments has been made on behalf of both Duchamp and Warhol, however those two names who created a fresh space at the art field in their times turned a deaf ear to these accusations intentionally or unintentionally. Eventually it has been proven that they were right about the fact that art doesn‟t have to follow the certain rules and the perception about art can be changed. İt is not easy to get used to this situation which is new and surprising for the art space, art market and art audience, as it is expected. These new movements, which can be called a breaking point, have revealed that what is different ant not art can also be art, and will eventually be accepted,and that the definition of artist will change radically. İn addition to the artist's effort for art, the idea of art gaining importance and the progress of this situation of parallel with the developing and changing world causedno discrimination in the process.The only one problem about this is that this new approach to art and the idea of everything the artist did is art would create a vicious circle and become an impasse. In this study, it is examined why the bells stopped tolling for the end of art in consideration of the statements made about art based on works of Duchamp and Warhol.
Alan : Güzel Sanatlar; Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
