User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 40
 Downloands 3
Çift Kör Hakemlik Sistemi Ne Kadar Kör?
2021
Journal:  
Journal of Higher Education and Science
Author:  
Abstract:

Akademik süreçlerin önemli bir aracı olan hakemlik sistemi sadece akademik çalışmaların yayınlanmaya uygunluklarının belirlenmesinde değil, araştırma bursu ve akademik pozisyon başvuruları ile terfi taleplerinin değerlendirmesindeki etkin rolüyle de vazgeçilmez olarak görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte son yıllarda kendisi akademik çalışmaların konusu hâline gelen sistem çeşitli yönlerden eleştirilmekte, makale yazarı ve hakemlerin niteliklerine bağlı yanlılıklar içerdiğini ortaya koyan çalışmalar yapılmakta ve bu olumsuzlukları giderebileceği düşünülen alternatifler aranmaktadır. Bu çalışmada iktisadi ve idari bilimler ve siyasal bilgiler fakültelerinin çıkardığı, TR Dizin kapsamında olan ve son üç yıldaki sayılarında makalelerin başvuru ve kabul tarihlerini yayınlayan dergiler taranmış ve makalelerin ortalama kabul sürelerinin yazım dili, yazar sayısı, yazarların unvanı, cinsiyeti ve bir üniversite mensubu olup olmadıklarına göre farklılaşmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Öte yandan, aynı alanda yayın yapan benzer nitelikteki dergilerin ortalama kabul sürelerinde büyük farklar gözlenmiştir. Daha da önemlisi, makale yazarlarının dergiyi çıkaran üniversiteye mensup olmaları makale kabul sürelerini anlamlı düzeyde kısaltabilmektedir. Bu durum çift kör hakemlik sürecinin editörlerce işletilen aşamalarında önemli ölçüde yanlılık oluştuğu, bazı yazarların makaleleri için yanlılığa sebep olacak şekilde hakem seçildiği veya editörlerin hakemlerle süreci etkileyecek şekilde iletişim kurduğu anlamına gelmektedir

Keywords:

Çift Kör Hakemlik Sistemi Ne Kadar Kör?
2021
Author:  
Abstract:

The arbitration system, which is an important instrument of academic processes, is not only considered indispensable for determining the suitableness of academic studies for publication, but also for its effective role in evaluating research scholarships and academic position applications and promotional requests. However, in recent years, the system that becomes the subject of academic studies itself is being criticized from various aspects, studies are being conducted which show that the authors and judges have errors related to their qualities, and alternatives are being sought to be resolved. In this study, the faculties of economic and administrative sciences and political information issued, the magazines that are within the framework of the TR Dizin and published the application and admission dates of articles in the last three years, and the conclusion was that the average admission period of articles did not differ according to the language of writing, the number of authors, the title of authors, the gender and whether they were a member of a university. On the other hand, large differences have been observed in the average reception periods of similar-quality magazines published in the same area. More importantly, the fact that the writers are members of the university that publishes the magazine can significantly shorten the entry periods of the article. This situation means that in the stages of the double-blind arbitration process, the editors make significant errors, that some authors are chosen to make errors for their articles, or that the editors communicate with the editors in a way that will affect the process.

How Blind Is Double Blind Review
2021
Author:  
Abstract:

The peer-review system as a critical tool in academic processes is regarded to be essential. It is not used only to evaluate the manuscripts submitted to the journals but also in tenure decisions, academic promotions, and grant applications. However, during the last few decades, the system has also become a subject of academic research and criticized from various aspects. Many scholars studied the process and presented biases emerging due to the characteristics of the authors and reviewers. In this paper, the journals published by the faculties of economics and administrative sciences and the faculties of political sciences and indexed by TR Dizin are studied. It is observed that the language of the article, number, title, gender, and institutional affiliation of the authors do not influence the acceptance period. However, there is a difference between the average acceptance periods of the journals, which are quite similar. Moreover, being a faculty member of the publisher provides a significantly shorter acceptance period on average. The reason for such differentiation may be either the existence of a considerable extent of bias at the editorial stages of the process or the communication of the editors with the reviewers in a way that influences the process.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






Journal of Higher Education and Science

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 623
Cite : 5.257
2023 Impact : 0.4
Journal of Higher Education and Science