Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 2
 Görüntüleme 18
 İndirme 6
WAVEONE, RECIPROC VE TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE DÖNER SİSTEM EĞELERİN ÇİFT KURVATÜRLÜ (S-ŞEKİLLİ) KANALLARDA DÖNGÜSEL YORULMA DİRENÇLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
2018
Dergi:  
Current Research in Dental Sciences
Yazar:  
Özet:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, İsviçre), Reciproc (VDW, Münih, Almanya) ve Twisted File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA, ABD) döner sistem nikel titanyum (Ni-Ti) eğelerin çift kurvatürlü (S-şekilli) kanallarda döngüsel yorgunluğa bağlı kırılma dirençlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 45 adet (WaveOne primary, Reciproc R25 ve Twisted File Adaptive M-L1) eğe kullanıldı. Her bir sistemden 15 eğe kırılıncaya kadar çift kurvatürlü (S-şekilli) yapay bir kanalda döndürüldü. Kırılıncaya kadar olan tur sayısı hesaplandı ve kırılmış parçaların uzunluğu kaydedildi. Veriler, ANOVA ve Tukey post hoc testleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p < 0.05 olarak belirlendi. Bulgular: Reciproc R25 eğeleri hem apikal hem de koranal kurvatürde, WaveOne primary ve Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 eğelerine göre döngüsel yorgunluğa karşı daha dirençli bulundu (p < 0.05). WaveOne primary ve Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 eğeleri arasında her iki kurvatürde de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p > 0.05). Bütün gruplar arasında aletlerin kırılmış fragmanlarının uzunluğu istatistiksel olarak benzer bulundu (p > 0.05). Sonuç: Reciproc R25 eğeler, WaveOne primary ve Twisted File Adaptive eğelere göre çift kurvatürlü kanallarda kırılmaya karşı daha dirençli bulundu. Anahtar Kelimeler: Döngüsel yorgunluk, Reciproc, WaveOne, S-şekilli kana  COMPARISON OF THE CYCLIC FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF WAVEONE, RECIPROC AND TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE FILES IN CANALS WITH  A DOUBLE CURVATURE (S-SHAPED) ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Reciproc (VDW, Münich, Germany) and Twisted File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) nickel titanium (Ni-Ti) systems in canals with a double curvature. Materials and Methods: Forty five rotary NiTi files (WaveOne primary, Reciproc R25 and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1) were used in this study. Fifteen files from each system were rotated in canals with a double curvature until fracture. The number of cycles to fracture was calculated and the length of each fractured fragment was recorded. The data were statistically analysed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The Reciproc R25 file had higher cyclic fatigue resistance than WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive in the apical and coronal curvatures (p < 0.05). There was no significant distinction in the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive files in either the apical or coronal curvature. The length of the fractured part of the instruments was similar among all the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The Reciproc R25 file indicated better cyclic fatigue resistance than WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive in an artificial canal with an S-shape. Keywords: Cyclic fatigue, Reciproc, WaveOne, S-shaped canal.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

WAVEONE, RECIPROC and TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE REVER SYSTEM WAVEONE, RECIPROC and TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE REVER SYSTEM WAVEONE, RECIPROC and TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE REVER SYSTEM WAVEONE, RECIPROC and TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE REVER SYSTEM WAVEONE, RECIPROC and TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE REVER SYSTEM
2018
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and Twisted File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) rotating system nikel titanium (Ni-Ti) curves with twisted (S-shaped) channels with cyclic fatigue-related breakdown resistance. Tool and Method: In this study, 45 curves (WaveOne primary, Reciproc R25 and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1) were used. Each system was twisted in a double curved (S-shaped) artificial channel until it was broken to 15 curves. The number of rounds until the broken was calculated and the length of the broken pieces was recorded. The data was statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post-host tests. The statistical significance level was determined as p < 0.05. Results: Reciproc R25 curves were found more resistant to cyclic fatigue in both apical and coral curvature, compared to the WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 curves (p < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between the WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 curves in both curvatures (p > 0.05). The length of the broken fragments of the tools among all groups was statistically similar (p > 0.05). The result: Reciproc R25 curves were found more resistant to breakdown in double curved channels than the WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive curves. Keywords: Circular fatigue, Reciproc, WaveOne, S-shaped cane COMPARISON OF THE CYCLIC FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF WAVEONE, RECIPROC AND TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE FILES IN CANALS WITH A DOUBLE CURVATURE (S-SHAPED) ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and Twisted File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) titanium (Ni-Ti) systems in a double curvature. Materials and Methods: Forty five rotary NiTi files (WaveOne primary, Reciproc R25 and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1) were used in this study. Fifteen files from each system were rotated in channels with a double curvature until fracture. The number of cycles to fracture was calculated and the length of each fractured fragment was recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The Reciproc R25 file had higher cyclic fatigue resistance than WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive in the apical and coronal curvatures (p < 0.05). There was no significant distinction in the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive files in either the apical or coronal curvature. The length of the fractured part of the instruments was similar among all the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The Reciproc R25 file indicated better cyclic fatigue resistance than WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive in an artificial channel with an S-shape. Keywords: Cyclic fatigue, Reciproc, WaveOne, S-shaped channel.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler












Current Research in Dental Sciences

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 1.431
Atıf : 2.160
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.013
Current Research in Dental Sciences