Özet:

Given the cognitive and philosophical perspectives, it is a question of the explicative power and separation of the extraction mechanisms in a way that is unlikely to be denied. As a result, such a distinction (especially the asymmetric distribution of different types of drawings) suggests the need for understanding the global or local text order to play an important role in the understanding of the text. Considering the distinction in the language use of not only semantic, but also pragmatic content, which is intended to investigate the necessity and role in ensuring consistency in the narrative texts and, if necessary, the contribution of non-coded content to the text is revealed, this article focuses on the distinction of the contribution of non-coded content to the text. Considering the structural theory and the philosophers related to this subject, by applying the extracting mechanisms proposed by this structural theory, the author can accordingly extract a certain part of the knowledge from the text structure and therefore make not only the conclusions called combinative to the reader to identify the lack of information, but also the predictive conclusions. Therefore, the relationship between the two meanings should not only be considered meaningfully. Therefore, the assessment of how extractive properties are determined and how they are integrated with this specified meaningful content varies from theory to theory. The cognitive approach proposed here for the "sens-post-search union" takes into account the concept of meaning integrity derived from a clearly expressed meaningful relationship or integration of meaningless relationships.

Anahtar Kelimeler: