Görüntüleme
52
İndirme
20
Dionysios Solomos’un (1798-1857) Yunan özgürlük hareketini duyarak İtalya’dan Zakynthos’a gelip Strani Tepesi’nde Mesologgi’den gelen savaş sesleri eşliğinde 1823’te yazdığı Özgürlük İlâhisi ile Mehmet Âkif Ersoy’un (1873-1936) kurtuluş mücadelesine edebî ve sosyal faaliyetleriyle destek olmak için İstanbul’dan Ankara’ya gelerek Tâceddin Dergâhı’nda yazdığı İstiklâl Marşı, farklılıkları da bulunmakla birlikte, birbirlerine oldukça benzer özellik gösterirler. Bestecileri Osman Zeki Üngör ve Nicolaos Halkiopoulos Mantzaros olan ve yalnızca ilk iki dörtlükleri besteli olarak okunan bu şiirlerden on kıtalık İstiklâl Marşı 12 Mart 1921’de, 158 dörtlükten oluşup dünyanın en uzun millî marşı olarak bilinen Özgürlük İlâhisi ise 4 Ağustos 1865’te resmî olarak kabul edilmiştir. Bu makalede her ikisi de millî şair olarak anılan Dionysios Solomos ve Mehmet Âkif Ersoy’un Yunan ve Türk halklarının ulusal meselelerine bakışı, sanatçı ve manevî önder olarak faaliyetleri; marşların yazılma, bestelenme ve resmî olarak kabul edilme süreçleri üzerinde durulacak, şekil ve içerik özellikleri ayrıntılı olarak analiz edilecektir. Her iki milletin başka düşmanlar yanında birbiriyle savaştığı ve özgürlük mücadelelerinin birbirlerine karşı olmayı gerektirdiği dönemlerde, benzer sosyal şartlar içerisinde doksan sekiz yıl arayla yazılan ve mücadelenin kutsallığını ön plana çıkaran her iki marşın benzerlik ve farklılıklarını toplumsal psikoloji bağlamında göstermenin amaçlandığı makalede bütün değerlendirmeler karşılaştırma yöntemiyle yapılacaktır. Genel olarak millî marşlarda öne çıkan kavramların Özgürlük İlâhisi’nde ve İstiklâl Marşı’nda birbirine çok benzer şekilde işlendiği, bunda toplumun pskolojisinin olduğu kadar her iki sanatçının düşünme biçimlerinin benzer olmasının da etkisi gösterilerek özgürlük, esaret, vatan, millet, kahramanlık, düşman, savaş, din ve kutsallık kavramları karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilecek, her iki marşta düşman imgeleri değerlendirilirken çok uzun olması dolayısıyla oldukça detaylı bilgi veren Yunan millî marşında Türk imgesi üzerinde ayrıntılı durulacaktır.
Dionysios Solomos (1798-1857) heard the Greek freedom movement coming from Italy to Zakynthos and accompanying the war sounds from Mesologgi on Strani Hill in 1823 and the Freedom Goddess of Mehmet Akif Ersoy (1873-1936) coming from Istanbul to Ankara to support his literary and social activities in the Tâceddin Journal, the Istiklal Marşı, which is written in the Tâceddin Journal, although there are differences, they show very similar characteristics to each other. These poems were composed by Osman Zeki Üngör and Nicolaos Halkiopoulos Mantzaros, and only the first two quarters were read as a composition, the Ten Continent Isticall Marks was officially accepted on March 12, 1921, and the Divine of Freedom, which consists of 158 quarters and is known as the longest national marks in the world, was officially accepted on August 4, 1865. In this article, both the national poet Dionysios Solomos and Mehmet Âkif Ersoy's view of the national issues of the Greek and Turkish peoples, the activities as an artist and spiritual leader; the processes of writing, composing and formally accepting the marches will be focused, the shape and content characteristics will be detailed. In the periods in which the two nations fight against each other alongside the other enemies and where the struggles for freedom require to be against each other, all the evaluations will be made by the comparison method in the article in which the similarities and differences of the two marks, which are written between nine and eight years in similar social conditions and which are aimed at showing the holiness of the struggle in the context of social psychology. In general, the concepts highlighted in national marches are processed in a very similar way in the Divine of Freedom and in the Istical Marche, in which the influence of both artists are similar as the pskology of society, and the concepts of freedom, prison, homeland, nation, heroism, enemy, war, religion and holiness will be compared to the Greek national marche, which gives very detailed information about the Turkish image in the Greek national marche, which is very long while assessing enemy images in both marches.
Dionysios Solomos (1798-1857), who heard of the Greek revolution and came to Zakynthos from Italy, wrote the Hyme to Liberty (Ymnos is tin Elefterian) on Strani Hill in 1823 with the sounds of war coming from Mesologgi and Mehmet Âkif Ersoy (1873-1936) came to Ankara from İstanbul to support the war of liberation in Anatolia with his literary and social activities and wrote the Anthem of Liberty (İstiklâl Marşı) at the Tâceddin Sufi Lodge which is very close to the battlefield. Although there are differences between the two national anthems, they are quite similar to each other. These anthems were composed by Osman Zeki Üngör and Nicolaos Halkiopoulos Mantzaros and only the first two stanzas of the anthems were composed. İstiklâl Marşı which has ten stanza is approved in 12 March 1921 and Ymnos is tin Elefterian which has 158 stanza is approved in 4 August 1865. In this article focussed that Dionysios Solomos's and Mehmet Âkif Ersoy's, both of whom are referred to as national poets, views on the national issues of the Greek and Turkish peoples, activities as artists and spiritual leaders. Processes of writing, composing and approving, form and content features of national anthems will be analyzed in detail. Both national anthems are written under similar social conditions with ninety-eight years difference while both nations fight other enemies and each other as against each other in times of liberation wars. In this article, which aims to show the similarities and differences of the two anthems that emphasize the sanctity of struggle in the context of social psychology, all evaluations will be made by comparison method. In general, the concepts that come to the fore in national anthems are very similar in the Ymnos is tin Elefterian and İstiklâl Marşı. Effecting of the similarity of the thinking styles of both artists as well as influence of the psychology of the society to this situation will be shown. The concepts of freedom, captivity, homeland, nation, heroism, enemy, war, religion and holiness will be analyzed comparatively. In the two anthems, the image of the enemy will be elaborated and the Turkish image will be elaborated in the Greek national anthem, which gives very detailed information.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Güzel Sanatlar; Hukuk; İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler; Spor Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
