Özet:

Islamism has come out since 19th century and formed in three branches in the world namely “Muslim Brother”s in Arabic Peninsula, “Cemaat-i Islami” in Indian subcontinent and Anatolian Islamism. Anatolian Islamism, which became visible firstly by Ottoman Islamists, became active at the backstage for a while after the proclamation of the republic. After Necmettin Erbakan had become independent member of the parliament from Konya in 1969, he started to organize “Milli Görüş” and then it became official. Unlike many Islamic formations which are active in Turkey, the most important feature of “Milli Görüş” is that it hasn’t involved in violence, even during the times when social violence were very intense or during the time when Islamic agenda became activist with Iran revolution, and it came into power by staying at democratic system. Milli Görüş which didn’t change his attitude, even though four of his political parties (National Order Party, National Salvation Party, Welfare Party, Virtue Party) were closed, has an important role and has a feature of being a distinguished laboratory in all of the Islamic formations. Starting out from the theoretical framework of religious radicalism, the main argument of this study is that, if Islamic political perspective is led properly it won’t bring radicalism and “Milli Görüş” can be shown as a sample. With in this context, the reasons behind the radicalization of “Milli Görüş” will be studied in four main points. The reasons generating from the Turkey’s typical conditions are the factor of leadership and the approach of perception of Islam, organization and the lastly Milli Görüş’s ideological data. Within the content of the study starting out from these four main points, by putting forward the differences of Milli Görüş from the other Islamist/Islamic formation, it is aimed to reach objective outcomes to prevent religious radicalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler: