User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 7
 Views 119
 Downloands 58
Sosyobilimsel Konulara Dayalı Fen Eğitiminin 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyobilimsel Konulara Bakış Açıları, Bilimsel ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi
2020
Journal:  
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmanın amacı yapılandırmacı yaklaşım yoluyla sosyobilimsel konulara (SBK) dayalı fen eğitiminin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyobilimsel konulara bakış açıları, bilimsel ve yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Çalışma 2016-2017 akademik yılının bahar döneminde Türkiye’nin kuzey batısında bir il merkezindeki devlet ortaokulunda öğrenim görmüş olan toplam 51 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Her iki gruptaki dersler MEB 7. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi programındaki kazanımlara uygun olarak 5E öğrenme modeline göre planlanmış ve derslerde temeli yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma dayalı birçok öğrenme-öğretme yöntem ve teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Deney grubunda kontrol grubundan farklı olarak maddenin yapısı ve özellikleri ünitesinde kimya endüstrisi konusunda SBK bağlamında bölgesel bir konu olarak Ergene Nehri Kirliliği ve ayrıca Gıda Katkı Maddelerinin Kullanımı, insan ve çevre ünitesindeki biyoçeşitlilik konusunda da yine bölgesel bir konu olan Gala Gölü Milli Parkı entegre edilmiştir. SBK olarak bölgesel konuların seçilmesi ile odaklanılan fen konuları ve katılımcıların yaşadığı bölgenin sorunları ilişkilendirilmiştir. Veri toplama araçları olarak Sosyobilimsel Konulara Bakış Ölçeği, Bilimsel Düşünme Yetenekleri Testi ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Ölçeği deney ve kontrol gruplarına ön ve sontest olarak uygulanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen tüm verilerin istatistiksel analizi SPSS programı aracılığıyla uygun betimsel ve çıkarımsal istatistiksel analiz teknikleri kullanılmış; analiz için gerekli varsayımların karşılandığı tespit edildikten sonra, ilgili testlerin öntest puanlarına göre düzeltilmiş sontest ortalama puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılığın olup olmadığı ANCOVA analiz tekniği kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre; SBK’a dayalı fen eğitiminin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinde SBK’a bakışlarında deney grubu lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilirken, bilimsel ve yansıtıcı düşünmeleri üzerine anlamlı bir farklılık elde edilmemiştir.

Keywords:

7 Responses to Social Education. The influence of classmates’ views on social and reflective subjects on their scientific and reflective thinking skills
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of the present study is to examine the effects of science education based on socioscientific issues (SSI) through the constructivist approach to attitudes towards SSI, scientific reasoning and reflective thinking skills of 7th grade students. In the study, a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with control group was used. The study was conducted by participation of 51 7th grade students in the academic year of 2016-2017. The sample of the study is determined through the selection of convenient sample. In the process of application, both experimental and control groups' lessons were planned according to the 5E learning model in the manner that includes many learning-teaching methods and techniques based on constructivist approach. On the other hand, Pollution of River Ergene, Utilization of Food Additive and Lake Gala National Park issues in the context of SSI were integrated into chemical industry biodiversity topics for the experimental group, whereas lessons were processed without underlining SSI in the control group. The Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues Scale (ATSIS), Lawson's Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTRS), and reflective thinking scale (RTS) were employed to collect data. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques through the SPSS program. After determining that the necessary assumptions were met for the ANCOVA analysis, ANCOVA technique was used. According to ANCOVA results, a significant difference was found between the ATSIS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between CTRS and RTS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups.

Keywords:

Effects Of Science Education Based On Socioscientific Issues On 7th Grade Students’ Views Of Socioscientific Issues, Skills Of Scientific and Reflective Thinking
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of the present study is to examine the effects of science education based on socioscientific issues (SSI) through the constructivist approach to attitudes towardas SSI, scientific reasoning and reflective thinking skills of 7th grade students. In the study, a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with control group was used. The study was conducted by participation of 51 7th grade students in the academic year of 2016-2017. Sample of the study is determined through selection of convenient sample. In the process of application, both experimental and control groups’ lessons were planned according to 5E learning model in the manner that including many learning-teaching method and techniques based on constructivist approach. On the other hand, Pollution of River Ergene, Utilization of Food Additive and Lake Gala National Park issues in the context of SSI were entegrated into chemical industry biodiversity topics for the experimental group, whereas lessons were processed without underlining SSI in the control group. The Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues Scale (ATSIS), Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTRS), and reflective thinking scale (RTS) were employed to collect data. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques through SPSS program. After determining that the necessary assumptions were met for the ANCOVA analysis, ANCOVA technique was utilized. According to ANCOVA results, a significant difference was found between the ATSIS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between CTRS and RTS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles




Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 251
Cite : 540
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty