Hukuk devleti ilkesinin sonuçlarından biri idarenin işlem ve eylemlerinin yargısal denetime tabi olmasıdır. İdari işlem ve eylemlerin hukuka uygun olup olmadıklarının yargısal denetimi idari mahkemeler tarafından yapılır. İdari yargı yerlerinde açılan davalarda davayı sonuçlandıran hukuksal kurumlardan biri de feragat kurumudur. Davadan feragat ile, davacı dava konusu istem sonucundan tamamen veya kısmen vazgeçer. Dolayısıyla feragat, davayı kesin olarak sonuçlandırır. İdari yargıda uyuşmazlıkların çözümü İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu’nda gösterilen usullere tabidir. Söz konusu Kanun’da feragate ilişkin herhangi bir düzenleme söz konusu değildir. Anılan Kanun’un 31. maddesi ile feragat konusunda Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’na atıf yapılmış ve bu Kanun’un feragate ilişkin hükümlerinin uygulanacağı belirtilmiştir. Ancak idari davaların özelliği ve imar planı/değişikliği davalarının da kamusal niteliği gereği feragat konusunda Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu düzenlemelerinden farklı uygulamalar söz konusudur. Bu bağlamda idari yargıda feragatin neden farklı uygulanması gerektiği de doktrin ve yargısal içtihatlarla ortaya konulmuştur.
Administrative actions and acts are subject to judicial review which is a natural result of the rule of law principle. This judicial review regarding whether the administrative actions and acts are lawful or not are carried out by the administrative courts. Waiver is one of the legal procedures that concludes the cases brought before the administrative courts. Through denial, the claimant completely or partially denies its claims in a dispute. Accordingly, waiver concludes the claim being waived definitely. The resolution of disputes in administrative justice is subject to the procedures set forth in the Code of Administrative Procedure. There is no regulation regarding the withdrawal in the aforementioned law. Article 31 of the aforementioned law refers to the Code of Civil Procedure in regard to the waiver and states that the provisions of the latter code regarding the waiver shall be applicable. Practices deviating from the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the withdrawal are emerged due to the inherent character of the administrative cases and public nature of the zoning plan/amendment cases. In this study, the reason why weakening should be applied in administrative justice in a different way is explained with doctrine and jurisprudence.
Administrative actions and acts are subject to judicial review which is a natural result of the rule of law principle. This judicial review regarding whether the administrative actions and acts are lawful or not is carried out by the administrative courts. Waiver is one of the legal procedures which conclude the cases brought before the administrative courts. Through waiver, the claimant completely or partially waives its claims in a dispute. Accordingly, waiver concludes the claim being waived definitely. The resolution of disputes in administrative justice is subject to the procedures set forth in the Code of Administrative Procedure. There is no regulation in respect of waiver in the mentioned law. Article 31 of the aforesaid law refers to the Code of Civil Procedure in regard to waiver and states that the provisions of the latter code regarding the waiver shall be applicable. Practices deviating from the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the waiver are emerged due to the inherent character of the administrative cases and public nature of the zoning plan/ amendment cases. In this study, the reason why waiver should be applied in administrative justice in a different way is explained with doctrine and jurisprudence.
Alan : Hukuk
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|