User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 19
 Views 143
 Downloands 36
SOSYAL MEDYADA DEZENFORMASYON VE HABER DOĞRULAMA PLATFORMLARININ PRATİKLERİ
2019
Journal:  
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Yeni iletişim teknolojilerinin 21. yüzyılla birlikte toplumsal hayat ve iletişim ortamı üzerinde dönüştürücü etkileri olmuştur. İnternet ve sosyal medyanın gündelik hayatlara git gide daha fazla entegre olmasıyla birlikte iletişim ve habercilik anlayışlarında da değişimler yaşanmıştır. İnternet’in sağladığı, bilgiye kolay ulaşım, haberlerin hızlı şekilde dolaşımı ve insanları ağlar üzerinde buluşturma gibi faydalarla birlikte; özellikle sosyal medya üzerinden dolaşıma giren “sahte haberlerin” kamuoyunun objektif/doğru haberler aracılığıyla oluşması idealini olumsuz şekilde etkilemektedir. Dijital ortamda faaliyet gösteren haber doğrulama platformları bu sahte haberlerle mücadelede önemli rol oynamaya başlamıştır. Bu çerçevede çalışmada, Türkiye ve dünyadan iki haber doğrulama platformu "Teyit.org” ve "Snopes.com" örnek vaka olarak seçilmiştir. Öncelikle bu platformların özellikleri ortaya koyulmuş, kullandıkları haber doğrulama yöntemleri incelenmiş ve içerik analiziyle bu platformların haber doğrulama süreçlerinde hangi konulara öncelik verdikleri belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca araştırmada, haber doğrulama amacıyla kurulan sivil toplum girişimlerinin sınırlılıkları tartışmaya açılmış ve bunların tek başına yeterli olmayacağı, bireylerin bilinçlenmesi ve dijital medya okuryazarlığı seviyelerinin arttırılmasının da aynı derecede önemli olduğunun altı çizilmiştir. 

Keywords:

Social Media Desinformation and News Verification Platforms Practices
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The new communication technologies have had a transformative impact on the society and communication environment in the 21st century. With the integration of the Internet and social media into everyday life, the practices of communication and journalism have also changed. Although the Internet brought easy access to information, the rapid circulation of news and the network structure that brings people together easily; the circulation of fake news via social media networks emerged as a problem that endangered the democratic public opinion formation process. Fact-checking platforms, which operate in digital media, have started to play an important role concerning the fight against this fake news issue. In this framework, the two fact-checking websites, “Teyit.org” and “Snopes. I have been chosen as case studies. First of all, the features of these platforms have been put forward, the fact-checking methods they use have been examined and via content analysis, which issues they prioritize in fact-checking processes have been revealed. In addition to that, the limitations of fact-checking services were discussed in the study. Also, it has been underlined that individual awareness against fake news and raising digital media literacy levels are equally important in addressing this issue.

Keywords:

Disinformation On Social Media and Practices Of Fact-checking Platforms
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The new communication technologies have had a transformative impact on the society and communication environment in the 21st century. With the integration of the Internet and social media into everyday life, the practices of communication and journalism have also changed. Although the Internet brought easy access to information, rapid circulation of news and the network structure which brings people together easily; circulation of fake news via social media networks emerged as a problem which endangers the democratic public opinion formation process. Fact-checking platforms, which operate in digital media, have started to play an important role concerning the fight against this fake news issue. In this framework, the two fact-checking websites, “Teyit.org" ve "Snopes.com" have been chosen as case studies. First of all, the features of these platforms have been put forward, the fact-checking methods they use have been examined and via content analysis, which issues they prioritize in fact-checking processes has been revealed. In addition to that, the limitations of fact-checking services were discussed in the study. Also, it has been underlined that individual awareness against fake news and raising digital media literacy levels are equally important in addressing this issue. 

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 597
Cite : 3.364
2023 Impact : 0.241
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi