User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 18
 Views 198
 Downloands 43
 Audio Listening 2
Finansal Performansın Rasyo Yöntemiyle Analizi: Borsa İstanbul’da (Bist’de) İşlem Gören Havayolu Şirketleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama
2019
Journal:  
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmada Borsa İstanbul’da (BİST’de) işlem gören Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş. ve Pegasus Hava Yolları A. Ş.’nin finansal performansı 2013-2017 periyodu için rasyo (oran) analizi ile incelenmiştir. Havayolları şirketlerinin finansal performansının analiz çalışması için şirketlerin bilanço ve gelir tablolarından faydalanılmıştır. Söz konusu şirketlere ait mali tablolar, Kamuyu Aydınlatma Platformu’ndan (KAP) alınmıştır. KAP’tan alınan veriler çalışmanın amacına uygun olarak 17 oranın hesaplanmasında kullanılmıştır. Borsa performans oranları çalışmaya dahil edilmemiş, uygulama çalışması Microsoft (MS) Excel bilgisayar programı (yazılımı) yardımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş.’nin likidite oranları Pegasus Hava Yolları A. Ş.’ye göre daha düşüktür. Aynı zamanda, net çalışma sermayesi ve borç ödeme gücü bakımından Pegasus Hava Yolları A. Ş., Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş.’ye göre daha başarılıdır. Genel olarak, her iki firma da faaliyetlerini etkin bir şekilde yürütmektedir. İşletmelerin sahip oldukları stokların geri dönüşümü ve alacakların da tahsil hızı yüksek olup, yıllar itibari ile istikrarlı bir seyir izlemiştir. Varlıkların kullanım etkinliğini ölçen varlık devir hızı incelendiğinde, her iki şirket de genel olarak başarılıdır. Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş.’nin borçluluk oranı, Pegasus Hava Yolları A. Ş.’ye göre daha yüksektir. Her iki şirket de duran varlık finansmanında ağırlıklı olarak uzun vadeli borçlanma ve öz kaynaklar yöntemini tercih etmiş olup, doğru bir finansman kararında bulunmuştur. Karlılık oranları incelendiğinde, her iki şirketin de dönemler itibari ile karlılıkları dalgalanma göstermektedir. Her iki şirketin de karlılık oranları birbirlerine yakın durumdadır. Firmaların, ana faaliyetleri konusunda karlı oldukları görülmektedir. Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş., cari oran hususunda sorunludur. Çalışmaya konu olan her iki şirketin de borçluluk oranlarının yüksek olduğu görülmektedir. İki şirket arasında kıyaslama yapacak olursak, Pegasus Hava Yolları A. Ş.’nin, Türk Hava Yolları A. Ş.’ye göre finansal performansı yüksek olup, yatırım açısından daha cazip konumdadır.

Keywords:

Finansal Performansın Rasyo Yöntemiyle Analizi: Borsa İstanbul’da (Bist’de) İşlem Gören Havayolu Şirketleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study, Turkish Airways A.S. and Pegasus Airways A.S. are traded in Borsa Istanbul (BIST). by S.The financial performance of the 2013-2017 period has been studied by the analysis of the ration (or) for the period. The airlines have taken advantage of the companies’ balance sheets and income tables to analyze the financial performance of the airlines. The financial statements of the companies in question have been taken from the Public Lighting Platform (KAP). The data obtained from the CAP were used in the calculation of 17 per cent according to the purpose of the study. The stock exchange performance rates are not included in the work, the application work is done with the help of Microsoft (MS) Excel computer program (software). According to the findings, Turkish Airways A. by S.The liquidity rates of Pegasus Airways A. by S.It is lower than it is. At the same time, Pegasus Airways A.S., Turkish Airways A.S. in terms of net work capital and debt payment power. by S.He is more successful. In general, both companies perform their activities effectively. The return of the stocks that the own and the receipts are also a high rate of taxation and a stable journey has been followed for years. When the asset conversion rate that measures the use efficiency of assets is studied, both companies are generally successful. The Turkish Airways A. by S.The debt ratio, Pegasus Airlines A. by S.It is higher than that. Both companies have preferred the method of long-term debt and self-resources in the permanent asset financing, and have made the right financing decision. When the profit rate is examined, both companies have a variation of profitability over the period. The profitability of both companies is close to each other. Companies are profitable in their main activities. The Turkish Airways A.S. is concerned with the car rate. Both companies have a high debt rate. If we’re going to compare between two companies, Pegasus Airlines A. by S.The Turkish Airways A. by S.The financial performance is high and is more attractive in terms of investment.

The Analysis Of Financial Performance With Ratio Method: An Implementation On Airline Firms Listed On Borsa Istanbul (bist)
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

This study investigated the financial performance of Borsa İstanbul (İstanbul Stock Exchange - BİST) listed firms named Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines for the 2013-2017 period with ratio analysis. Balance sheets and income statements were used to analyze the financial performance of two airline firms. The mentioned financial statements of Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines were retrieved from Public Disclosure Platform (KAP). Data gathered from Public Disclosure Platform (KAP) were utilized to calculate 17 ratios parallel to the aim of study. Stock exchange performance ratios were not included to the study and calculations were done using Microsoft (MS) Excel computer program (software). According to the findings of research, liqudity ratios of Turkish Airlines are lower than Pegasus Airlines. Also, net working capital and debt paying performance of Pegasus Airlines is better than Turkish Airlines. In general, it is determined that both firms are running their operations efficiently. Inventory turnover and receivables turnover ratios of Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines are both high, having a steady trend through years. Concerning the assets turnover ratio which measures the efficiency of assets, both firms are successful in general. The debt ratio of Turkish Airlines is higher than Pegasus Airlines. Both firms are financing their fixed assets with long term liabilities and owner’s equity, which is a correct financial decision. When profitability ratios are analyzed, it is seen that profitabilities of Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines fluctuate over the years. Moreover, profitabilities of both firms are close to each other. Furthermore, both companies are profitable in terms of main area of activity. Turkish Airlines experiences problems regarding the current ratio. It is also observed that, debt ratios of both firms are high. When the two airline firms are compared, it is realized that financial performance of Pegasus Airlines is higher than Turkish Airlines, making it more attractive for investment.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles


MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.936
Cite : 9.800
2023 Impact : 0.503
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi