Özet:

The famous Islamic historian al-Safadī (d. 764/1363), comments al-Ṭug̲h̲rāʾī’s (d. 515/1121) ode (Qasīda) named Lāmiyyat al-ʿAjam with the name al-Ghayth alladhī insajama. Ibn al-Damāmīnī (d. 827/1424), one of the most important figures of the fifteenth century wrote a critique study under the name Nuzūl al-ghayth to criticize this work of al-Safadī .This study does not aim to explain and criticize the text that we see in classical annotations (hashiyah). İnstead, he is penned to criticize al-Safadī and disparage his work with stern words such as “if this man had been ashamed, he would not have said these things.” Ibn Aqbars writes a book called Taḥkīm al-ʻuqūl to compare these two texts due to the harsh and excessive criticism of Ibn al-Damāmīnī. The subject of this article is Ibn al-Damāmīnī’s criticism of al-Safadī. In this direction, first of all, the moral principles of debate will be emphasized within the framework of the discipline of debate. After that, information about Ibn al-Damāmīnī's work called Nuzūl al-ghayth will be provided and this work will be evaluated in terms of its content. In the last section, the harsh statements used by Ibn al-Damāmīnī when criticizing the opposite view will be emphasized.

Anahtar Kelimeler: