Çevre hakkı veya sağlıklı ve dengeli bir çevrede yaşama hakkı, günümüzde artan çevre sorunları ve bunların diğer temel hak ve hürriyetleri etkisi bağlamında daha sık gündeme gelmekte ve tartışılmaktadır. Bu açıdan çevre hak-kının yargısal makamlar nezdinde doğrudan koruma alanı bulması önemli bir sorun teşkil etmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türk hukukunda Anayasa’nın 56. maddesinde tanınan sağlıklı ve dengeli bir çevrede yaşama hakkının, Anayasa Mahkemesine yapılan bireysel başvuru kararlarında ne ölçüde koruma bulduğu mevcut içtihatlar ışığında incelenmiştir. Türk hukukunda bireysel başvurunun sadece Anayasa ile AİHM ve taraf olduğumuz ek protokollerin ortak koruma alanında bulunan haklar açısından tanınması sebebiyle çevre hakkı, doğrudan bireysel başvuru konusu yapılamamaktadır. Ancak AİHM içtihatlarına paralel olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi, çevreye ilişkin meselelerden kaynaklı başvuruları Sözleşme’de korunan başka temel haklar kapsamına sokarak ko-rumaktadır. Bu başvurular çoğunlukla özel hayata saygı hakkı, adil yargılanma hakkı ve mülkiyet hakkı kapsamında değerlendirilmektedir.
The right to the environment or the right to live in a healthy and balanced environment is more frequently discussed and discussed in the context of the impact of today’s increasing environmental problems and their other fundamental rights and freedoms. In this regard, it is a major problem that the environmental right-person finds a direct area of protection at the court authorities. In this study, the Turkish law examined in the light of the existing provisions of the right to live in a healthy and balanced environment recognized in Article 56 of the Constitution, to the extent to which the right to live in a healthy and balanced environment is protected in the individual application decisions made to the Constitutional Court. As a result of the recognition of individual application in the Turkish law only in terms of the rights in the field of joint protection of the Constitution and the UNHCR and the additional protocols that we are party to, environmental rights, cannot be directly subject to individual application. However, in parallel with the laws of the UNHCR, the Constitutional Court is committed to bringing applications arising from environmental issues into the scope of other fundamental rights protected in the Convention. These applications are mostly considered within the framework of the right to respect private life, the right to fair trial and the right to property.
Recently, the right to environment or the right to live in a healthy and bal-anced environment is more frequently discussed in the context of increasing environmental problems and their impact on other fundamental rights and freedoms. In this respect, the direct protection of right to environment before judicial authorities poses an important legal problem. The right to live in a healthy and balanced environment, recognized in Article 56 of the Turkish Constitution. However, since the individual application in Turkish law is only accepted in terms of the common rights in the Constitution and the ECtHR, this right cannot be directly subjected to individual application. Nevertheless, in line with the ECtHR case law, the Constitutional Court accepst applications originating from environmental issues by including them within the scope of other fundamental rights protected by the Convention. These applications are mostly evaluated within the scope of the right to respect for private life, the right to a fair trial and the right to property. In this study the decisions of the Constitutional Court upon individual applications about environmental prob-lems have been examined and criticized in the light of its existing case law.
Alan : Hukuk
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|