User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 30
 Downloands 3
Influential Factors on Mathematical Literacy of Turkish Students: An Educational Data Mining Study Using PISA 2015 Data
2023
Journal:  
Psycho-Educational Research Reviews (PERR)
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract This study aims to classify students as successful and unsuccessful regarding mathematical literacy on Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 database through data mining methods. The sample consists of all Turkish students who participated in PISA 2015. While data mining methods such as Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and J48 were used in data analysis, the data set was evaluated with 10-fold Cross-validation. The evaluation criteria included F-measure, Precision, Recall, Matthews Correlation Coefficient, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). In the classification of successful and unsuccessful students, analyses were conducted with 13 statistically significant variables according to Chi-SquareAttributedEval, GainRatioAttributeEval, and InfoGainAttributeEval methods. The results showed that the most important variables for classifying successful and unsuccessful students were learning time per week in total, and father’s education level. The highest ROC value was 0.720. When comparing the precision values, the lowest classification value for the Multilayer Perceptron method was 0.645. There was no single method that performed best for all criteria. Researchers should use at least two methods to obtain more accurate results.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






Psycho-Educational Research Reviews (PERR)

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 323
Cite : 225
2023 Impact : 0.138
Psycho-Educational Research Reviews (PERR)