Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to identify the level of alienation and whether the students’ alienation scores differ meaningfully according to their gender, age, grade, section, family income and to intend to use the technology. Quantitative research method was used in this research. As a result university students’ weakness, anomy, meaninglessness and isolation level is medium. This alienation scores in four dimensions don’t differ according to scores of gender, age, grade and family income of the students. Students’ isolation scores don’t differ according to student’s section. In weakness literature and math students have significantly higher scores than theology students; architecture students have significantly higher scores than religious culture and ethics teaching, history, crop protection, nursing, economics, theology and business students. In anomy religious culture and ethics teaching students have significantly lower scores than history, crop protection, literature, nursing, economy, business and architecture students; theology and math students have significantly lower scores than architecture students. Students’ weakness and isolation scores don’t differ according to student’s to intend to use the technology. In Anomy dimension scores of university students who use technology for social media face book – tweeter are significantly higher than scores of students who use technology for book – journal - article. Meaninglessness scores of students’ who use technology for social media face book – tweeter are significantly higher than scores of students who use technology for news

Keywords: