Views
354
Downloands
12
Terditli dava, davacının dava dilekçesi ile davalıya karşı aralarında hukukî veya ekonomik bir bağlantı bulunan birden fazla talebini aslilik ferilik ilişkisi kurarak açtığı davadır. Hukukumuzda terditli dava ile ilgili düzenleme HMK md. 111'de yer almaktadır. Belirtilen maddenin ikinci fıkrasındaki düzenlemeye göre, mahkeme davacının asli talebinin esastan reddine karar vermedikçe, fer’î talebini inceleyemez ve hükme bağlayamaz. Buna göre, mahkeme terditli davada davacı tarafından ileri sürülen taleplerden önce asli talebi inceleyip karar verecektir. Mahkemenin davacı tarafından ileri sürülen ferî talep ya da taleplerle ilgili olarak inceleme yapıp karar verebilmesi için asli talebin esastan reddedilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada ise Yargıtay 8. Hukuk Dairesi tarafından verilen 6.2.2018 tarih ve 2016/18484-1696 sayılı karar HMK md. 111 hükmü doğrultusunda terditli dava ve özellikle terditli davada hüküm konusu ele alınarak incelenmeye çalışılmıştır.
The proceedings are the case in which the prosecutor has opened a multitude of claims against the prosecutor, which have a legal or economic connection between them, by establishing an original freelance relationship. Procedure in the case of HMK MD. It is located in 111. In accordance with the provisions of the second subparagraph of the specified article, the court may not examine and judge his request, unless the original request of the prosecutor is essentially rejected. Accordingly, the court will examine and decide the original request before the requests submitted by the prosecutor in the relevant case. The original request must be essentially rejected in order for the court to be able to investigate and decide on the legal request or requests submitted by the applicant. In this case, the judgment is 8. 6.2 by the Department of Law. Date 2018 and Decision No. 2016/18484-1696 HMK md. In accordance with Article 111 of the Court of Appeal, the judgment was tried to be examined by the subject of the judgment, and in particular in the case of the judgment.
Progressive lawsuit is a type of case in which the plaintiff goes to the law by primary-secondary relation for more then one requests that have legal or economic relationship among each other with a complaint against defendant. Regulations related to progressive lawsuit take part in Rule 111 of Code of Civil Procedure. According to the second sub-section of stated rule, the court cannot review and give judgement the secondary request unless the court decide a limine dismissal of the primary request of plaintiff. Accordingly, in the progressive lawsuit the court will review and decide the primary request before other requests of theplaintiff. In order for the court to make review about secondary request or requests propounded by the plaintiff and make a decision, primary request must be dismissed a limine. In this study, according to the decision of 8th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals dated 6.2.2018, numbered 2016/18484-1696, Rule 111 of Code of Civil Procedure; progressive lawsuit and especially judgment in progressive lawsuit are examined in detail.
Field : Hukuk
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
