Özet:

Coastal tourism and second homes in Foça and Dikili have caused negative changes and even transformations in natural, rural and urban spaces from past to present. Where, why and how this process started and what it has changed over time is the subject of this article. The problems that arise in geographical space are analysed through the mixed qualitative research method consisting of geographical area research, case study and comparison. According to the findings, although the natural factors that play a role in the development of coastal tourism in Foça and Dikili are similar, the intensity and areal extent of the spatial effects of tourism are different from each other. The reasons for the difference are multidimensional, consisting of the protection statuses, proximity to İzmir, coastal forms and beach formations, coasts suitable for construction, recognition and later participation in tourism. As a result, the mass character of tourism continues to rapidly transform the spatial identity of Foça and Dikili. In this case, local governments, tourism actors, NGOs and high-level public institutions should work in coordination and use their planning, management and supervision skills effectively in order to protect locality. Joint decisions taken on the basis of participation and strict adherence to those decisions will be able to minimize all kinds of negative effects of tourism by promoting sustainable and responsible tourism.

Anahtar Kelimeler: