Özet:

This study was conducted in Turkey with the aim of comparing the DGD system that was implemented between 2000-2005 and the other support methods that were implemented between 2006-2015 in terms of funding sources. The survey, which was conducted during the DGD period, also demonstrated the impact of DGD's producers on the total family income and agricultural income, and tried to determine whether the DGD system could be an alternative to other supports in this regard. A total of 164 enterprises, including 128 enterprises in the DGD area and 36 enterprises without DGD, were surveyed. According to the survey, the share of non-agricultural income in the total family income in enterprises under the DGD is 11.80%. In that do not benefit from DGD, this rate is higher (27.81%). The share of the agricultural income of the reviewed producers in the total family income varies according to the that benefit from the DGD and not benefit from it. The share of those who benefit from DGD is 71.71%, and those who do not benefit from DGD are 72.19%. The secondary data comparisons were made in the period before and after the DGD; the total budget of the subsidies, tax revenues, domestic debt and external debt for both periods were studied and exchanged. According to this, transfer from taxpayers in the period 2004-2005 of the DGD was 32.07 per cent of the total transfer, while in the years after the DGD this rate increased gradually and increased to 54.12 per cent. DGD’s transfers from consumers in the period 2000-2001 were 37.17%, while after DGD in the period 2006-2008 60%. In the years 2012-2014, it was 46.32%. The rate of budget transfers was 1.68% in the DGD period, up to 4.98% in the 2009-2011 period after the DGD, and again 0.44% in the 2012-2014 years. These findings show that in recent years the burden of agricultural aid has risen over taxpayers.

Anahtar Kelimeler: