User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 4
 Views 779
 Downloands 115
 Audio Listening 2
İmâmiyye Şiası’nın İmâmet Teorisinin İtizalî ve Sünnî Eleştirisi
2019
Journal:  
Usul İslam Araştırmaları
Author:  
Abstract:

İmâmet meselesi, İslâm tarihinin erken döneminden günümüze kadar tartışma konusu olmaya devam etmiştir. İmâmetin vücûbiyeti, dayanakları, imâmda bulunması gereken vasıflar, ilk dört halifenin meşruiyeti, nass ve tayin meselesinin reddi, imâmın azli ve gaybeti gibi mevzular etrafında tartışılan imâmet, İmamiyye Şiası tarafından önemli bir inanç esası haline evrilmiştir. İmâmiyye Şiası’nın fıkhî ve amelî bir konu olan imâmet meselesini bir iman esası olarak görmesi, imâmın ancak nass ve tayin yoluyla belirlenebileceğini ve özel bazı vasıflarla mücehhez olduğunu savunması üzerine, Mu’tezile ve Ehl-i Sünnet imâmet meselesine ilişkin tartışmalara dâhil olmuştur. Bu çalışmada öncelikle İmâmiyye Şiası’nın konuya dair görüşleri üzerinde kısaca durulmuş, ardından da Mu’tezile ve Ehl-i Sünnet’in İmâmiyye Şiası’na reddiye şeklinde ortaya koydukları görüşleri mercek altına alınmıştır. Neticede Mu’tezile ve Ehl-i Sünnet’in imâmet konusundaki görüşlerinin, ileri sürdükleri delillerin ve İmâmiyye Şiası’na yönelttikleri eleştirilerin aynı minvalde olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords:

Criticism and criticism of the Theory of Imamity
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The issue of arism has continued to be a topic of debate from the early period of Islamic history until today. The body of the Imam, the foundations, the qualities to be found in the Imam, the legitimacy of the first four alphabets, the rejection of the issue of the nass and the appointment, the immaculation discussed around the positions such as the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, the immaculation, and the immaculation. In the words of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: In this study, first the opinions of the Imamiya Shea on the subject were briefly focused, then the opinions of Mu'tezile and Ehl-i Sünnet in the form of rejection of the Imamiya Shea were understood. In the end, the opinions of Mu'tezile and Ehl-i Sünnet on the immates, the evidence they advanced and the criticism they directed to the Imamiya Shea were found in the same minval.

Keywords:

Ahl Al-sunnah and Mu’tazila Critic On Imamiyah Theory Of Imamiyah Shi’ah
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The issue of Imamat has continued to be the subject of debate since the early period of Islam to the present. The Imamat, which has been discussed around issues such as necessecity of the imam, foundations of the imam, the qualifications that should be found on imam, the legitimacy of the first four caliphs, the rejection of texts and the assignment issues, dismissal and missing of imam, has been evolved into an important belief principle by the Imamiyyah Shi’ah. Imamiyah Shi’a has seen the imamat, which is actually a jurisprudence and practice issue, as base of faith and believed that it can only be determined by texts and appointment and the imam should have some special qualities, so that Mutazilah and Ahl al-Sunnah have involved to the discussion on the imamat issue. In this study, firstly the opinions of Imamiyyah Shi’ah on the subject were briefly discussed, then the opinions of Mu’tazila and Ahl al-Sunnah as rejection to the Imamiyye Shi'ah were discussed. As a result, it was found that Mu’tazila and Ahl al-Sunnah are the same in the context of their opinions on the Imamat issue, the evidence they put forward and their criticism of the Imamiyya Shi’ah.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Usul İslam Araştırmaları

Field :   İlahiyat

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 91
Cite : 41
Usul İslam Araştırmaları