User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 149
 Downloands 46
İbn Rüşd Felsefesinde Kötülük
2019
Journal:  
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy
Author:  
Abstract:

Dinî ve felsefî alanda en çok tartışılan konulardan biri olan kötülük meselesi, antik çağdan günümüze teolog ve filozoflar nezdinde farklı düzlemlerde ve farklı paradigmalar ekseninde ele alınmış, konuyla ilgili birçok argüman geliştirilmiştir. Aristoteles şârihi ve İslam filozofu İbn Rüşd ise, kötülük konusunu dinî referanslar çerçevesinde ve Aristoteles’in izinde dinî/kelâmî ve felsefî boyutlarıyla ele almıştır. O bu konuda kelâm mezheplerinden Eş‘arîlerin, felsefecilerden ise Sofistlerin görüşlerine karşı durmuştur. Ancak İbn Rüşd, kötülük meselesiyle ilgili müstakil bir risale veya eser kaleme almadığından konuyla ilgili bilgiler eserlerinde pasajlar hâlinde dağınık bir şekilde bulunmaktadır. Bu minvalde, kötülük meselesiyle ilgili bilgilerin İbn Rüşd’ün eserlerinde dinî, kelâmî ve felsefî bağlamlarda parçacı bir yaklaşımla ele alınması, onun temel argümanlarını belirlemede en büyük zorluğu oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışma, İbn Rüşd’ün kötülükle ilgili yaklaşımlarını bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla, hayır, şer, rölativizm, hidâyet, dalâlet, ontoloji, fenomenoloji, inâyet ve madde kavramları etrafında ele almaktadır.

Keywords:

İbn Rüşd Felsefesinde Kötülük
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The question of evil, one of the most discussed topics in the religious and philosophical field, has been discussed by theologists and philosophers from ancient times to present in different levels and in the axis of different paradigms, and many arguments on the subject have been developed. Aristotle, the poet and Islamic philosopher Ibn Rushd, addressed the issue of evil in the framework of religious references and in the trace of Aristotle with his religious/clamatic and philosophical dimensions. He has been opposed to the opinions of the philosophers and the philosophers in this regard. However, Ibn Rushd does not receive a special resume or work paper on the issue of evil, and the information on the subject in his works is distorted in the case of passages. In this minval, the processing of information on the issue of evil in the works of Ibn Rushd with a particular approach in religious, literary and philosophical contexts, constitutes the greatest difficulty in determining its basic arguments. This study deals with the approaches of Ibn Rushd to evil with a comprehensive viewpoint, surrounding the concepts of good, evil, relativism, guidance, wrath, ontology, phenomenology, inity and matter.

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 543
Cite : 852
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy