The aim of this research is to make a comparative evaluation of the curricula of the 2006 and 2018 Technology and Design courses according to the program components. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. The research is a descriptively designed descriptive study. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. As a result of the research, it can be said that in 2006 and 2018 TT course curriculum, the elements of the curriculum are fully present but are taken into consideration in both programs, even with some changes. 2006 and 2018 curriculum; It is seen that there are significant differences in learning areas, content and measurement and evaluation dimensions. It is seen that the most important difference between the programs is in the learning area approach and the subjects and units are completely changed. It was found that there was no significant difference in acquisitions numbers in both programs but the acquisitions were almost completely changed depending on the learning areas. It was determined that the acquisitions were numerically higher in both programs, the content and learning teaching process changed almost completely, while the basic approach remained the same in the assessment assessment dimension, but the tools and methods that were dealt with in the 2006 program were not included in the 2018 program.
The aim of this research is to make a comparative evaluation of the curricula of the 2006 and 2018 Technology and Design courses according to the program components. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. The research is a descriptively designed descriptive study. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. As a result of the research, it can be said that in 2006 and 2018 TT course curriculum, the elements of the curriculum are fully present but are taken into consideration in both programs, even with some changes. 2006 and 2018 curriculum; It is seen that there are significant differences in learning areas, content and measurement and evaluation dimensions. It is seen that the most important difference between the programs is in the learning area approach and the subjects and units are completely changed. It was found that there was no significant difference in acquisitions numbers in both programs but the acquisitions were almost completely changed depending on the learning areas. It was determined that the acquisitions were numerically higher in both programs, the content and learning teaching process changed almost completely, while the basic approach remained the same in the assessment assessment dimension, but the tools and methods that were dealt with in the 2006 program were not included in the 2018 program.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|