Özet:

Abstract The aim of this study is to analyze the intangible asset evaluation approaches presented in national and international literature. Therefore, there was use of a philosophical basis constructivist and the Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist (ProKnow-C) as an intervention tool for literature review. This survey was carried out on the following basis: (i) EBSCO; (Ii) ProQuest; (Iii) Scopus; (Iv) Science Direct; and (v) Spell, where it was met the total of 1,672 articles using the words: Intellectual Capital or Intangible Assets and Organization in their (i) titles, (ii) abstracts or (iii) keywords. From the research improvement using the criteria (i) exclusion of repeated / redundant articles; (Ii) alignment of articles to the subject as the title; (Iii) scientific recognition of articles; (Iv) alignment of articles to the subject as the abstracts; and (v) availability of full articles, it was reached to a Bibliographical Portfolio (CP) consisting of 28 articles. By analyzing this PB, it was identified a total of 41 approaches to evaluation of intangible assets. Skandia Navigator was the most cited approach, totaling 13% of the citations. It was also found categories and the framing of each approach, identifying that there are some gaps in research involving the evaluation approaches.

Anahtar Kelimeler: