Atıf Sayısı
3
Görüntüleme
56
İndirme
14
İdari gözetime alternatif tedbirleri, idari gözetime göre yabancıların temel hak ve özgürlüklerini daha az kısıtlayan tedbirler ve yükümlülükler olarak tanımlamak mümkündür. 6458 Sayılı Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu’nda 6 Aralık 2019 tarihinde yapılan değişiklik ile mevzuatımıza idari gözetime alternatif tedbirler getirilmiştir. İdari gözetime alternatif tedbirlerin kanunumuzda düzenlenmesi ülkemizdeki göçmenlerin özgürlük ve güvenlik hakkı bakımından oldukça önemli bir gelişme teşkil etse de Türk hukuk doktrininde bu konuda yapılan çalışmaların sayısı oldukça sınırlıdır. Makalenin amacı uluslararası hukuk ve karşılaştırmalı hukukta idari gözetime alternatif tedbirleri incelemek suretiyle doktrine katkıda bulunmaktır. Makalenin ilk kısmında Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi de dahil olmak üzere ilgili uluslararası hukuk belgeleri ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararları incelenmek suretiyle idari gözetime alternatif tedbirlere ilişkin uluslararası hukuk çerçevesi ve insan hakları temelli idari gözetim alternatiflerinin unsurları ortaya konulacaktır. Makalenin ikinci kısmında ise idari gözetime alternatif tedbirlerin Birleşik Krallık, Kanada ve Avusturya hukukunda ne şekilde düzenlendiği ve uygulamada hangi hususlara dikkat edildiği incelenecektir. Bu incelemeler ışığında makalenin sonuç kısmında ise ülkemizde idari gözetime alternatif tedbirlerin düzenlenmesi ve uygulanması ile ilgili bazı tespit ve önerilere yer verilecektir.
Alternative measures for administrative supervision can be defined as measures and obligations that under administrative supervision less restrict the fundamental rights and freedoms of foreigners. Amendments to Foreigners and International Protection Act No. 6458 dated December 6, 2019 introduce alternative measures for administrative supervision in our legislation. The implementation of alternative measures to administrative supervision in our law is a very important development in terms of the right to freedom and security of immigrants in our country, although the number of work done on this issue in the Turkish law doctrine is quite limited. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the doctrine by studying alternative measures for administrative supervision in international law and comparative law. The first part of the article will examine the relevant international legal documents, including the European Convention on Human Rights and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the international legal framework for alternative measures for administrative supervision and the elements of alternative administrative supervision based on human rights. The second part of the article will examine how alternative measures for administrative supervision are regulated in the UK, Canada and Austria law and what aspects are taken into account in its application. In light of these reviews, the result section of the article will include some findings and recommendations on the organization and implementation of alternative measures for administrative surveillance in our country.
The term ‘alternatives to detention’ refers to the range of measures that fall short of full deprivation of liberty or administrative detention. The Turkish Law on Foreigners and International Protection (Law No 7196) was amended on 6 December 2019. With this amendment, alternatives to immigration detention were introduced to the Turkish asylum laws. Introduction of these alternatives constitutes an important development especially considering its implications for the right to liberty and security of migrants in Turkey. Despite this importance, there are very few academic sources written in Turkish on this matter. The aim of this article is to contribute to the existing literature by examining alternatives to immigration detention in international law and comparative law. In doing so, the first part of the article will examine the international law framework and identify elements of alternatives to immigration detention that are in line with fundamental rights through an analysis of the relevant literature and the European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence. Whereas, the second part of the article will analyse how the alternatives to immigration detention are regulated and implemented in the United Kingdom, Canada and Austria. In light of this analysis, the conclusion will make a number of recommendations on the regulation and implementation of the alternatives to immigration detention in Turkey.
Alan : Hukuk
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
