Özet:

Whistleblowing can be defined as communicating an unethical or illegal event or situation to persons who have the authority to solve this matter. The statement is divided into two forms: official whistleblowing and non-official whistleblowing. When using the official whistleblowing, the reporting party applies to the official authorities when communicating the illegal situation or the incident. But when he chooses an informal type of whistleblowing, the reporter communicates it verbally to the people he knows and trusts. As a subgroup of these, the reports are divided into three groups. These are: silence, internal notification and external notification. Working in silence, for various reasons, the events to be, chooses to remain silent while aware of the event and not to do anything. The main reason for this is that the spyware doesn’t want to eat or not trust the organization. It is internal notice that the employee is informing the senior authority of the enterprise of the illegal and unethical situation. However, if the organization believes that it is not approached to a solution, the employee requires an external notice. Working in the external reporting, the court, the media, the police, and other non-operative authorized organizations report the illegal and unethical situation. In the cases that have to be notified, in cases that harm the health or security of the community, in cases such as theft or fraud, in cases that violate the ethical rules, education, moral values, laws, legal regulations and government policy, in cases of discrimination on gender, nationality, religion and race. If it is done, it will be given the benefit of all the information. There are some factors that influence the reporting. These have been divided into Hassink, Vries and Bolle in 2007;29-30 in five categories. These can be classified as psychological factors, ethical and cultural factors, corporate or structural factors, kinds of misconduct or revenge, and ultimately the wrong practices. There are some dangers in the reporting perspective. This is the first step of the reporting. These movements are seven ways. At the beginning of these misleading movements the attention comes to the reporting that from the situation in this process, the reporting is brought to the forefront and is attacked on the professional competence, reliability and private life of the reporting. The other step is to create a weak record. In this process, those who act illegally begin to create inventory documents to show that the reporting is a problematic and insufficient employee. Another threat is to force the messenger to remain silent. In this phase, the name of the reporting agency is also understood by various threats to prevent the illegal incident from being announced. Another move is the application of mobbing to the reporter. The goal here is to work for the reporting to be dismissed over time. Another missile movement is to prepare the ground for failure. In this very commonly used method of misleading, the reporter is trying to fail by giving things that he can’t get out of the beginning. The second step is to prosecute the prosecutor. The reporter is mostly confronted with this misleading movement and is accused of receiving the data in his hands by unlawful means. The ultimate step is to destroy the career of the reporter. In this process, the reporting is dismissed and attempted to prevent it from entering the job by giving negative references. It is necessary for the company to establish an effective reporting policy to prevent the risks mentioned above. For this reason, what it needs to do is to be determined by the senior administration, education, communication, ombudsman office, control and control, reward, punishment, protection, written codes and rules, fair investigation process and the announcement of the result and the right information to the public. In this study, the news stories of Samet Kuşçu and Mahir Kaynak, who military coup attempts in Turkey, were attempted to be told.

Anahtar Kelimeler: