Özet:

The perceptions and models existing in practice and theory about the founding elements of political order can be categorized into three main lines: the concept of actor-centered political order, the concept of institutional-centered political order and the concept of assabity-centered political order, which we think is not correctly represented in the main-course literature, will try to be formulated in our last article, on the one hand, and on the other hand, as an alternative to existing perceptions. It must be immediately pointed out that when it comes to political order, the importance and even insignificance of all three elements cannot be denied. Indeed, in the relevant literature, despite the relative negligence of the element of "satisfaction", the variables of both actors and institutions were largely able to find their place in the modeling of political order. Therefore, as the word "center" indicates, the point that differentiates the above approaches is not to prefer one of these elements and completely neglect the other, but to perceive one of these elements as "first cause" and/or "independent variable" and to see the other as secondary causes or dependent variables. We will also here, without denying the importance of actors and institutions, defend the centrality and thus determinability of the element of "assembly", and will suggest that the first two elements, despite their important roles in politics, will gain meaning only depending on the variable of "assembly" as a first cause.

Anahtar Kelimeler: