Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 2
 Görüntüleme 61
 İndirme 14
Developing Internalized Sexism Scale For Women: A Validity and Reliability Study
2020
Dergi:  
International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture
Yazar:  
Özet:

Sexism refers to beliefs, behaviors and institutional practices that contribute to the protection of existing gender inequality in society, harming individuals, affects all genders but it mostly affects women. Internalized sexism is the sexism that women direct to themselves or other women. Since internalized sexism differs from directly visible sexism, it often remains unnoticed and hinders an effective fight against gender inequality. Thus, developing an instrument to measure internalized sexism is of great significance. This study aims to develop a measurement tool to measure internalized sexism in women. In this study, data were collected from 1088 female participants, ages 18-53 from three different study groups. Content validity, construct validity and reliability studies were conducted in the scale development process. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis showed that the scale comprised of 5 sub-dimensions as Self-Objectification, Derogation, Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, Competition/Self-Separation, and Male Prioritization) and this construct was then tested in a different study group with First and Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency was 0.84 for the whole Internalized Sexism Scale, 0.75 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.75 for Derogation, 0.71 for Internalized Powerlessness, 0.71 for Self-Separation, and 0.66 for Male Prioritization. The test-retest reliability for the whole scale was 0.76, 0.76 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.69 for Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, 0.73 for Self-Separation, and 0.64 for Male Prioritization. As a result of the validity and reliability analyses, it can be stated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Developing Internalized Sexism Scale For Women: A Validity and Reliability Study
2020
Yazar:  
Özet:

Sexism refers to beliefs, behaviors and institutional practices that contribute to the protection of existing gender inequality in society, harming individuals, affects all gender but it mostly affects women. Internalized sexism is the sexism that women direct to themselves or other women. Since internalized sexism differs from directly visible sexism, it often remains unnoticed and prevents an effective fight against gender inequality. Thus, developing an instrument to measure internalized sexism is of great significance. This study aims to develop a measurement tool to measure internalized sexism in women. In this study, data were collected from 1088 female participants, ages 18-53 from three different study groups. Content validity, construct validity and reliability studies were conducted in the scale development process. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis showed that the scale comprised of 5 sub-dimensions as Self-Objectification, Derogation, Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, Competition/Self-Separation, and Male Prioritization) and this construct was then tested in a different study group with First and Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency was 0.84 for the whole Internalized Sexism Scale, 0.75 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.75 for Derogation, 0.71 for Internalized Powerlessness, 0.71 for Self-Separation, and 0.66 for Male Prioritization. The test-retest reliability for the whole scale was 0.76, 0. 76 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.69 for Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, 0.73 for Self-Separation, and 0.64 for Male Prioritization. As a result of the validity and reliability analyses, it can be stated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler










International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture

Alan :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 385
Atıf : 135
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini