User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 37
 Downloands 3
Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills test instrument on Quadratic Equation (HOTS-QE) for secondary school students
2023
Journal:  
Pegem Education and Instruction Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract The Higher-Order Thinking Skill Test Instrument on Quadratic Equations (HOTS-QE) was developed to measure the level of HOTS on the topic of quadratic equations among secondary school students. The HOTS-QE instrument consists of 17 structured subjective items divided into two smaller questions according to the three levels of HOTS, namely applying, analysing, and evaluating. The development of the HOTS-QE instrument comprised seven stages, namely source analysis, theory, development, content validity, validation of the HOTS domain accuracy, language validity, and pilot study. The content validity of the instrument was evaluated by five mathematics education experts. The results showed that the item content validity index (I-CVI) value of each item was above 0.70 while the content validation per scale (S-CVI) value was 0.98. Results from the interrater evaluation also showed that the HOTS level accuracy of the instrument items had achieved the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient value of 0.63. In addition, findings from the pilot study also showed that the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient value was 0.79, the discrimination index value of each item was between 31.11% to 66.67%, and the difficulty index values were between 40.74% to 70.00%. These results suggest that the HOTS-QE instrument has an acceptable level of validity. The development of this instrument provides a more varied learning assessment that can foster students’ interests in learning, help them to improve HOTS, and provide opportunities for students to directly apply the knowledge of quadratic equations learned at school in their daily life.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






Pegem Education and Instruction Journal

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 472
Cite : 572
Pegem Education and Instruction Journal