In this study, an answer is looked for the question of “Does capital import activate domestic saving and economic growth in Turkey?”. Displaying the relationships between economic growth, domestic saving and capital import has formed the purpose of the study in two different development strategy period and covering both two period; 1964-2012. Granger-causality techniques are used to perform this in applied methodology. While the bi-directional causality between variables has been investigated in the period 19641980, the causality has not been observed in the period 19802012 and 1964-2012. It is understood from this point of view that, the effects of capital import which is the sum of public and private sectors to domestic saving and economic growth for Turkey that has position of developing country shows differences according to applied development strategies, and this effect follows an unstable path
In this study, an answer is looked for the question of "Does capital import activate domestic savings and economic growth in Turkey?". Displaying the relationships between economic growth, domestic savings and capital import has formed the purpose of the study in two different development strategy period and covering both periods; 1964-2012. Granger-causality techniques are used to perform this in applied methodology. While the bi-directional causality between variables has been investigated in the period 19641980, the causality has not been observed in the period 19802012 and 1964-2012. It is understood from this point of view that, the effects of capital import which is the sum of public and private sectors to domestic savings and economic growth for Turkey that has position of developing country shows differences according to applied development strategies, and this effect follows an unstable path
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|