Özet:

The question of the eternity of the world in Latin thought, it was discussed in the context of Plato, Aristotle and Boethius' view and translated works of Muslim philosophers such as Avicenna, Ghazali and Averroes. In time, the issue of the eternity of the world has become an important problem, which is widely discussed and different views are defended among the Latin philosophers and theologians, especially at the University of Paris. The main issues discussed in the question of the eternity of the world are whether it is possible to rationally base the eternity or creation of the world, whether the created world has a temporal onset, and whether the created eternal world doctrine requires a contradiction. While Bonaventure, an important representative of the Franciscans sect, one of the influential sects at the University of Paris, denied that the claim that the world was eternal due to it is incompatible with the Catholic doctrine that the world was created from nothing; Aquinas, the representative of the Dominican sect, which was influential in the university, defended the possibility of the eternal world without the temporal onset of the world based on rational justifications. He wrote the treatise De Aeterniate Mundi, in which he dealt with the possibility of the eternity of the world, with the aim of criticizing Bonaventure and his contemporaries who refused to eternal creation from ex nihilo, and establishing arguments against their arguments. In the treatise, while Aquinas refers to Anselm, Boethius, Augustine and Aristotle in support of his views; it is noteworthy that he did not make a positive or negative reference to Muslim philosophers, such as Avicenna and Averroes, whose views were described as heretic in the condemnations published in 1270 and 1277, which deeply affected Latin thinkers and colleagues in the matter of eternity of the thr world. Considering the content and arguments of the treatment in general terms, it criticized and rejected the critics without giving names by directly discussing their claims and developing opposing arguments. In establishing his own opinion, Aquinas tried to solve the problem by addressing the issues and the objections raised directly on the issue of the eternity of the world, rather than addressing every possibility of criticism. In the treatise, Aquinas did not establish a direct argument on why the world should be created from ex nihilo, but he positively addressed the question of whether God could create the world eternally in the context of logical possibilities and responded positively. He warned that although the world is created, its temporal onset is not a logical necessity and that the opposite claims cannot be proved with philosophical/rational justifications. In the treatise, instead of directly answering the question of whether the created world from ex nihilo has a temporary beginning, the question of whether God can create the world without temporary onset – how can be understood from the nature of the arguments and the conclusions he has made – he tried to logically explain the question of whether God can create the world without temporary beginning from nothing and how should be understood religious doctrine that the world created from nothing. After evaluating the arguments for and against, he concluded that the creation of the world without its temporal onset is logical, since the creation of the world without temporal does not require a logical contradiction. Rather than claiming that God cannot create a world without a temporal onset, Aquinas states that there is no rational evidence against this claim, and that such claim does not require metaphysical impossibility. He argued that the temporal onset of the world cannot be accurately claimed, but can be believed, since the structure of the world as a whole does not contain any evidence/explanation that it was later established in a certain period of time. With this attitude, Aquinas differs from the Bonaventure and Neo-Agustinists, who argue that the impossibility of the eternity of the world can be rationally grounded. Aquinas grounded the claim that the view that the world exists eternally cannot be rationally grounded, but that it can be believed in two different ways. The first is that the structure of the world does not contain any evidence to support this claim; secondly, it is not known when and how and when God manifests his free will in creating the world. As a result, Aquinas tried to justify his own view after he listed and evaluated the arguments in favor of and against the eternity of the world. In this context, he considered and evaluated three different claims of philosophers one by one, that the world became existent after ex nihilo, it is impossible for God to create the eternal created world, and all beings except God came into existence, but that man lacked realization of this. Having established that both claims were wrong and incompatible with the Catholic faith, the third claim that everything, including the world, began to exist afterwards, that God might have created the world eternally, but that the individual's intellect cannot realize when and how, and argued that this could only be known by revelation because of the lack of grounding it on rational ground.